Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the value of parameters derived from intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating histopathological subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC).METHODS:Between May 2014 and December 2015, a total of 69 patients who were surgically and pathologically diagnosed as renal cell carcinoma were recruited for the study. We examined 61 clear cell RCC (ccRCC), and 8 non-clear cell carcinoma (non-ccRCC, including 7 chromophobe RCC and 1 papillary RCC). All the ccRCC were divided into well differentiated group (n=46), moderately differentiated group (n=8), and poorly differentiated group (n=7). In addition to routine renal magnetic resonance imaging examination performed on a 3.0-Tesla MR system, all patients were imaged with axial intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging. Using biexponential model, we calculated the diffusion coefficient (D), pseudodiffusion coefficient (D(*)), and perfusion fraction (f).RESULTS:The D and f values of the ccRCC were higher (each P<0.05) than that for non-ccRCC [D (1.29±0.30)×10(-3)mm(2)/s, D(*) (42.92±20.21)×10(-3)mm(2)/s, and f (35.71±6.61)% versus D (0.78±0.23)×10(-3)mm(2)/s, D(*) (32.60±11.33)×10(-3)mm(2)/s, and f (21.52±8.44)% ]. In the well differentiated group of ccRCC, we found D of (1.36±0.29)×10(-3)mm(2)/s, D(*) (38.39±18.51)×10(-3)mm(2)/s, and f (36.40±6.96)%. The D, D(*,) f values of moderately differentiated lesions were (1.10±0.24)×10(-3)mm(2)/s, (59.90±20.23)×10(-3) mm(2)/s, and (32.88±4.02)%, respectively, those of the poorly differentiated group were (1.03±0.16)×10(-3)mm(2)/s, (53.28±18.74)×10(-3)mm(2)/s, and (34.42±6.21)%. The well differentiated group of ccRCC showed a higher D value than the moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated groups (each P<0.05). D(*) values were significantly lower for the well differentiated group than for the moderately differentiated group (P<0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of D values were 90.2% and 87.5% when focusing on the differentiation of ccRCC. For the diagnosis of ccRCC, the sensitivity and specificity of f values were 98.4% and 75.0%, respectively.CONCLUSIONS:IVIM-DWI can provide certain reliable value in evaluating pathological subtype and differentiation degree of renal cell carcinomas. D and f values are useful to distinguish ccRCC from non-ccRCC. D value is also promising for estimating the differentiation degree of ccRCC, and to indicate the biological behavior of RCC.

Grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma by using monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched exponential diffusion-weighted MR imaging

Comparison of Biexponential and Monoexponential DWI in Evaluation of Fuhrman Grading of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Differentiating between malignant and benign renal tumors: do IVIM and diffusion kurtosis imaging perform better than DWI?

Grading Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Grade Using Diffusion Relaxation Correlated MR Spectroscopic Imaging

Comparison of Monoexponential, Biexponential, Stretched-Exponential, and Kurtosis Models of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Differentiation of Renal Solid Masses.

Diffusion-weighted and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Analysis of Microstructural Differences in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Comparative Study

Comparative Study of Conventional Diffusion- Weighted Imaging and Introvoxel Incoherent Motion in Assessment of Pathological Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Can diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of clear cell renal carcinoma predict low from high nuclear grade tumors

Application of DWI with Various B Values in Diagnosis of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Fuhrman Grades SHEN

Comparison of the Diagnostic Value of Monoexponential, Biexponential, and Stretched Exponential Diffusion-weighted MRI in Differentiating Tumor Stage and Histological Grade of Bladder Cancer.

Monoexponential, Biexponential, and Stretched Exponential Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Models: Quantitative Biomarkers for Differentiating Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma and Minimal Fat Angiomyolipoma.

[Application of Diffusion-Weighted Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging in Diagnosis of Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes].

Predicting Grade of Esophageal Squamous Carcinoma: Can Stretched Exponential Model-Based DWI Perform Better Than Bi-Exponential and Mono-Exponential Model?

Investigation of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Grades Using Diffusion-Relaxation Correlation Spectroscopic Imaging with Optimized Spatial-Spectrum Analysis

Multiparametric diffusion-weighted imaging in breast lesions: Association with pathologic diagnosis and prognostic factors.

Comparison of the monoexponential and biexponential models of diffusion-weighted magnetic imaging in grading clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: a case-control study

Grading Meningiomas Using Mono-Exponential, Bi-Exponential and Stretched Exponential Model-Based Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging

Diffusion-weighted Imaging in Assessing Renal Pathology of Chronic Kidney Disease: A Preliminary Clinical Study

The Role of Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Differentiation of Malignant Renal Tumors

Differentiation of central gland prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia using monoexponential and biexponential diffusion-weighted imaging

Histogram analysis of stretched-exponential and monoexponential diffusion-weighted imaging models for distinguishing low and intermediate/high gleason scores in prostate carcinoma.