Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To explore the value of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and perfusion weighted imaging (PWI) in identifying benign and malignant renal masses and differentiating the histological types of renal masses. METHODS:Fifteen healthy volunteers and 46 patients with renal masses proven by pathology, including clear cell carcinomas (n = 18), papillary carcinomas (n = 8), chromophobe carcinomas (n = 7) and angiomyolipomas (n = 13), were examined with DWI and PWI scan at 3.0 T MRI. ANOVA was employed to compare the values of transfer constant (K(trans)), rate constant of backflux (Kep) and extra-vascular extra-cellular space fractional volume (Ve) proceeded by PWI and the value of ADC resulted from DWI between normal kidney and different histological types of renal masses. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to analyze and compare the diagnostic value of the methods of PWI and DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses. RESULTS:The ADC value of normal renal parenchyma was (2.10 ± 0.24) × 10⁻³ mm²/s, which was statistically higher than benign and malignant renal masses (P < 0.05). The ADC value of benign masses was statistically higher than that of all histological types of malignant masses (P < 0.05). Among three histological types of malignancies, clear cell carcinoma showed the statistically highest ADC value (P < 0.05). But the difference between papillary carcinoma and chromophobe carcinoma had no statistical significance (P > 0.05).Values of K(trans), Kep and Ve between normal renal parenchyma and different histological types of renal masses had statistical differences.Values of K(trans) and Ve in three histological types of malignant renal masses were statistically higher than those of benign renal masses.Kep value of clear cell carcinoma was significantly higher than that of benign renal masses (P < 0.05).However, other histological types of malignant masses had no significant difference with benign masses.For three malignant masses, K(trans) of clear cell carcinoma, papillary carcinoma and chromophobe carcinoma were (0.85 ± 0.27), (0.51 ± 0.04) and (0.39 ± 0.05)/min respectively. All values gradually reduced. And the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The Ve value of renal clear cell carcinoma was statistically higher than that of papillary carcinoma (P < 0.05). ROC curve was used to analyze and compare the diagnostic value of PWI versus DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses. The K(trans) of benign and malignant renal masses had the largest AUC (AUC = 0.937) at a threshold of 0.38/min. And there were a sensitivity of 87.9% and a specificity of 85.7%. The AUC of ADC was 0.823, sensitivity 72.7% and specificity 92.9%. The ADC threshold for differentiating benign from malignant masses was 1.40 × 10⁻³ mm²/s; AUC of Ve 0.803, sensitivity 78.8% and specificity 71.4%, a threshold of 0.29/min; Kep showed lower diagnostic value. CONCLUSION:3.0 T MRI DWI and PWI can effectively differentiate benign and different histological types of malignant renal masses. And PWI is superior to DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses.K(trans) with the largest AUC showed the highest diagnostic value. And ADC is also irreplaceable in providing the information of cellular structural features and the movement of water diffusion.

Application of DWI with Various B Values in Diagnosis of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Fuhrman Grades SHEN

Differentiating between malignant and benign renal tumors: do IVIM and diffusion kurtosis imaging perform better than DWI?

Comparison of Biexponential and Monoexponential DWI in Evaluation of Fuhrman Grading of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Comparative Study of Conventional Diffusion- Weighted Imaging and Introvoxel Incoherent Motion in Assessment of Pathological Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

The Role of Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Differentiation of Malignant Renal Tumors

Diffusion-weighted and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Analysis of Microstructural Differences in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Comparative Study

Can diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of clear cell renal carcinoma predict low from high nuclear grade tumors

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram Analysis: Differentiation of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma from Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma with R-Field of View Diffusion Weighted Imaging

Grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma by using monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched exponential diffusion-weighted MR imaging

[Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Perfusion Weighted Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Renal Masses on 3.0 T MRI].

Different B-Value Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Differential Diagnosis of Upper Urinary Tract Cancer and Non-Specific Inflamation

Diffusion-weighted Imaging in Assessing Renal Pathology of Chronic Kidney Disease: A Preliminary Clinical Study

Value of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Assessment of Pathological Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Comparison of Utility of Histogram Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and R2*For Differentiation of Low-Grade from High-Grade Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Grading Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Grade Using Diffusion Relaxation Correlated MR Spectroscopic Imaging

[Application of Diffusion-Weighted Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging in Diagnosis of Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes].

The Role of Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer

Feasibility of ADC reflecting enhancement and differentiation of cervical squamous cell carcinomas in multi-b-value DWI on 3.0T MRI

Diagnostic Utility of Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Differentiating Small Solid Renal Tumors (≤4 Cm) at 3.0T Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Correlation Research of the ADC Value of MR Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Differential Differentiation of Rectal Tumor, Perineural Invasion and Peritumor-Intravascular Cancer Emboli

Application of R2* and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Estimating Tumor Grade and T Category of Bladder Cancer.