Abstract:El Premio Nobel es uno de los premios más deseados en ciencia y más conocidos en la sociedad. Sin embargo, su reputación no está exenta de complejidades, incluidas las limitaciones para los galardonados y los prejuicios en las nominaciones. Navegar por el delicado equilibrio entre el reconocimiento y los impactos concretos de las contribuciones premiadas debería ofrecer una idea de la importancia del premio más allá del mero prestigio y su valor monetario. Si bien otros premios pueden presumir de mayores recompensas financieras, a menudo carecen del mismo nivel de prestigio. La inclusión de figuras públicas como galardonadas y la amplia cobertura mediática en torno al Premio Nobel elevan aún más su importancia percibida, aunque esto podría ocultar una realidad más matizada. Asimismo, las asociaciones positivas vinculadas al nombre «Nobel» que se asemejan al adjetivo «noble» pueden realzar el prestigio del premio. Esta sutil conexión con la «nobleza» añade una capa de honor y distinción al premio, contribuyendo a su importancia y prestigio percibidos. Además, la sobrerrepresentación de premios Nobel de países específicos provoca un escrutinio sobre el cumplimiento del testamento del Nobel, que prioriza las contribuciones al bienestar global. Esta discrepancia plantea dudas sobre la inclusión y el impacto global del premio. The Nobel Prize is one of the most sought-after awards in science and society. However, its reputation is not without complexities, including constraints on laureates and biases in nominations. Navigating the delicate balance between recognition and the tangible impacts of awarded contributions should offer insight into the Prize's significance beyond mere prestige and monetary value. While other awards may boast higher financial rewards, they often lack the same level of prestige. The inclusion of public figures as laureates and the extensive media coverage surrounding the Nobel Prize may further elevate its perceived importance, though this may hide a more nuanced reality. Additionally, the positive associations linked to the name “Nobel” resembling the adjective “noble” can enhance the award's prestige. This subtle connection to “nobility” adds a layer of honor and distinction to the Prize, contributing to its perceived significance and prestige. Moreover, the overrepresentation of Nobel laureates from specific countries prompts scrutiny over the fulfillment of Nobel's testament, which prioritizes contributions to global well-being. This discrepancy raises questions about the inclusivity and global impact of the Prize.

How a silly science prize changed my career

Contrasting aspects of human excreta

A Nobel Pursuit May Not Run like Clockwork

Inventing Prizes

Fusion of arts and science: 'Parasitology Got Talent'

Dogs and their genes: what ever will they think of next?

How to win a Nobel prize

Interdisciplinarity: A Nobel Opportunity

AI comes to the Nobels: double win sparks debate about scientific fields

Keeping in touch with the road not taken

Animal and human innovation: novel problems and novel solutions

Why science is less scientific than we think (and what to do about it): The 2022 Gaston Labat Award Lecture

"An epoch-making and blessed moment in the history of medicine" -thoughts on international health equity and the Nobel prize in medicine

The Enigma of the Impervious Nobel Prize for Neurosurgeons

Conditioning Conformity: A Neuroscientific Funding and Publishing Paradox

Maple-scented cacti and pom-pom cats: how pranking at work can lift lab spirits

When crayfish make news, headlines are correct but still misleading

La paradoja del Premio Nobel: premios Nobel, no premios nobles

Daily briefing: How PhD assessment needs to change

Impact in psychiatry research through experimentation, translation to industry, policy development and public engagement

From the bench to the farm and back again