Conditioning Conformity: A Neuroscientific Funding and Publishing Paradox

Bernard,C.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/eneuro.0193-24.2024
2024-05-17
eNeuro
Abstract:Why does groundbreaking progress in our understanding of the brain seem scarce (at least to me)? The prevailing system of research funding and publication, deeply rooted in peer review and contingent upon preliminary data, tends to favor safe, conventional ideas, thereby impeding major breakthroughs. The prerequisite of preliminary data for hypothesis validation transforms grant-seeking into a cycle that prioritizes data accumulation over pioneering ideas, fostering publications that align with pre-established notions endorsed by reviewers. Are we, the scientists, becoming akin to the subjects of our experiments? Consider this: in behavioral studies, rodents are often deprived of food and water to motivate their learning of a task. Since a successful task is rewarded, animals quickly learn the task and become very efficient at it after some time. Now, envision neuroscientists in a similar plight, navigating the pursuit of funding and recognition in high-profile journals. This predicament is faced by many (from undergraduate students to established principal investigators) in our field: a constant scramble for financial support and influential publications to advance our research and careers. But who holds the power to reward our efforts? In the case of rodents, scientists dictate the terms; they design the experiments and determine the rewards. Unlike Douglas Adams' claim in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy that humans are monitored by mice (but are we?), it is our human peers who judge the worthiness of our work for funding and publication. Does this relentless cycle of deprivation and reward truly nurture innovation, or are we conditioning our brightest minds to conform to a well-trodden path? To illustrate my point, consider an analogy to Escher's famous staircase, which we ascend in the hopes of attaining a deeper understanding of the brain (Fig. 1). However, this pursuit is an illusion akin to Escher's endless staircase, where progress ...
neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?