Abstract:Accurate assessment of animal emotion (affect) is an important goal in animal welfare science, and in areas such as neuroscience and psychopharmacology. Direct measures of conscious emotion are not available, so assessment of animal affect has relied on measures of the behavioural and physiological components of affective states. These are important indicators but have some limitations (e.g. measuring emotional arousal rather than valence (positivity vs negativity)). Human psychology research suggests that changes in cognitive function (information processing) can also be reliable indicators of emotional state (especially valence). For example, people in negative states attend to threats, retrieve negative memories, and make negative judgements about ambiguous stimuli more than happier people. Here we review a new research area investigating the possibility that such affect-induced ‘cognitive biases’ also occur in animals. We focus on a novel ‘judgement bias’ paradigm in which animals are trained that one cue predicts a positive event and another cue predicts a less positive/negative event, and are then presented with ambiguous (intermediate) cues. The hypothesis is that animals in a negative affective state will be more likely to respond to (‘judge’) these ambiguous cues as if they predict the negative event (a ‘pessimistic’ response), than animals in a more positive state. Recent studies of rats, dogs, rhesus monkeys, starlings and humans provide face-value support for this hypothesis. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the affect manipulation treatments used in these studies, and the possibility that treatment-induced changes in feeding motivation, general activity and learning are responsible for the effects observed, and we consider whether the type of bias observed and the precise design of the judgement bias task can provide information about different types of affective state. Judgement biases may result from the influence of affect on decision-making processes including attention to and perception of the ambiguous cue, evaluation of the value and probability (expected utility) of the outcomes of different responses, and action selection. Affect might also modulate general tendencies of loss, risk and ambiguity aversion, hence biasing decisions. We discuss these possibilities in relation to theory and findings from neurobiological and psychological studies of decision-making, in order to better understand the potential mechanisms underlying judgement biases. We conclude with some specific recommendations for study design and interpretation, and suggestions for future research in this area.

The Neurochemistry of Science Bias

Potential for Bias in the Context of Neuroethics

Cognitive Bias under Adverse and Rewarding Conditions: A Systematic Review of Rodent Studies

Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias

Neural correlates of ingroup bias for prosociality in rats

The negativity bias, revisited: Evidence from neuroscience measures and an individual differences approach

The seductive allure of the brain: Dualism and lay perceptions of neuroscience

Conditioning Conformity: A Neuroscientific Funding and Publishing Paradox

A New Research Trend in Social Neuroscience: Towards an Interactive-Brain Neuroscience

Neuroculture: on the Implications of Brain Science

The hidden side of animal cognition research: Scientists' attitudes toward bias, replicability and scientific practice

Putting the “Biology” Back into “Neurobiology”: The Strength of Diversity in Animal Model Systems for Neuroscience Research

The description-experience gap: a challenge for the neuroeconomics of decision-making under uncertainty

Cognitive bias as an indicator of animal emotion and welfare: Emerging evidence and underlying mechanisms

Keep it real: rethinking the primacy of experimental control in cognitive neuroscience

Modeling a negative response bias in the human amygdala by noradrenergic-glucocorticoid interactions

Who is at risk of bias? Examining dispositional differences in motivated science reception

A neurocomputational account of the link between social perception and social action

Exploration, inference and prediction in neuroscience and biomedicine

On the neural networks of self and other bias and their role in emergent social interactions

Science needs neurodiversity