Abstract:Key Points T cells with αβ T-cell receptors (TCRs) respond to foreign antigen in the form of short peptides that are bound to MHC class I or class II proteins. These TCRs are generated by somatic DNA rearrangements and random chain pairing, and hence, lack predictable specificity for their ligands. Optimal signalling in response to MHC ligands requires co-engagement of the TCR and either a CD4 (MHC-class-II-binding) or CD8 (MHC-class-I-binding) co-receptor. Immature thymocytes express both CD4 and CD8, but mature functional T cells express the co-receptor molecule that has an MHC-class specificity that matches that of the cell's TCR. During T-cell differentiation in the thymus, CD4+CD8+ double-positive (DP) precursors must make a lineage decision to become CD4+ (helper) or CD8+ (cytotoxic) T cells. Two models have been proposed to explain how a T cell that expresses a TCR with an unpredictable specificity emerges from the thymus with the required match between the MHC-binding preferences of TCR and co-receptor. The instruction model postulates that TCR–CD4 binding of a self-peptide–MHC-class-II ligand generates a signal that is distinct from that produced on co-binding of a TCR and CD8 molecule to a self-peptide–MHC-class-I ligand. These unique signals 'instruct' the precursor DP T cell to choose the correct lineage fate and develop into a CD4+ or CD8+ T cell. The selection model postulates that precursor DP T cells randomly choose a fate and lose expression of either CD4 or CD8. Further differentiation and survival depends on the cell having chosen correctly, so that it receives a signal from coordinate binding of the TCR and co-receptor to a self-peptide–MHC ligand. For TCRs that are specific for MHC class I, CD8 must be retained, whereas for TCRs with MHC class-II specificity, CD4 must be retained; the wrong choice dooms the cell at this checkpoint. Recent data indicate that a combination of these two models is a more accurate description of reality. The current 'strength of signal' model proposes that the intensity/duration of initial signalling dictates lineage choice; strong/long signalling leads to the CD4 pathway, whereas weaker/shorter signalling prompts the CD8 choice. This is generally correlated with MHC class-II versus class-I binding, respectively, because of differential association of LCK with the two co-receptors in DP thymocytes. A combination of negative selection and cell loss due to a failure to sustain signalling removes most of the cells that make 'incorrect' choices (overly strong MHC class-I reactivity that promotes CD4 lineage choice or very weak MHC class-II reactivity that leads to the CD8 lineage). The role of NOTCH proteins in this lineage-decision process remains controversial.

Developmental Origin Governs CD8+ T Cell Fate Decisions during Infection

Lineage Tracking the Generation of T Regulatory Cells From Microbial Activated T Effector Cells in Naive Mice

Precursor central memory versus effector cell fate and naïve CD4+ T cell heterogeneity

Hierarchal single-cell lineage tracing reveals differential fate commitment of CD8 T-cell clones in response to acute infection

Heterogeneity and plasticity of the naive CD4+ T cell compartment

Longitudinal single cell transcriptional and epigenetic mapping of effector, memory, and exhausted CD8 T cells reveals shared biological circuits across distinct cell fates

T-cell development and the CD4–CD8 lineage decision

Divergent cytokine and transcriptional signatures control functional T follicular helper cell heterogeneity

Shared and distinct biological circuits in effector, memory and exhausted CD8 + T cells revealed by temporal single-cell transcriptomics and epigenetics

Functional Diversity of Memory CD8 T Cells is Spatiotemporally Imprinted

Lineage relationship and protective immunity of memory CD8 T cell subsets

CD8+ T Cells Utilize Highly Dynamic Enhancer Repertoires and Regulatory Circuitry in Response to Infections.

Deciphering gene regulatory programs underlying functionally divergent naive T cell subsets

NK-like CD8 T Cell: One Potential Evolutionary Continuum between Adaptive Memory and Innate Immunity

Self-reactivity controls functional diversity of naive CD8+ T cells by co-opting tonic type I interferon

Distinct developmental pathways generate functionally distinct populations of natural killer cells

Insights into immune system development and function from mouse T-cell repertoires

A linear ontogeny accounts for the development of naive, memory and tumour-infiltrating regulatory T cells in mice

Homeostasis-Stimulated Proliferation Drives Naive T Cells to Differentiate Directly into Memory T Cells

Division of labor between subsets of lymph node dendritic cells determines the specificity of the CD8+ T‐cell recall response to influenza infection

The architectural design of CD8+ T cell responses in acute and chronic infection: Parallel structures with divergent fates