T-cell development and the CD4–CD8 lineage decision

Ronald N. Germain

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nri798

IF: 108.555

2002-05-01

Nature Reviews Immunology

Abstract:Key Points T cells with αβ T-cell receptors (TCRs) respond to foreign antigen in the form of short peptides that are bound to MHC class I or class II proteins. These TCRs are generated by somatic DNA rearrangements and random chain pairing, and hence, lack predictable specificity for their ligands. Optimal signalling in response to MHC ligands requires co-engagement of the TCR and either a CD4 (MHC-class-II-binding) or CD8 (MHC-class-I-binding) co-receptor. Immature thymocytes express both CD4 and CD8, but mature functional T cells express the co-receptor molecule that has an MHC-class specificity that matches that of the cell's TCR. During T-cell differentiation in the thymus, CD4+CD8+ double-positive (DP) precursors must make a lineage decision to become CD4+ (helper) or CD8+ (cytotoxic) T cells. Two models have been proposed to explain how a T cell that expresses a TCR with an unpredictable specificity emerges from the thymus with the required match between the MHC-binding preferences of TCR and co-receptor. The instruction model postulates that TCR–CD4 binding of a self-peptide–MHC-class-II ligand generates a signal that is distinct from that produced on co-binding of a TCR and CD8 molecule to a self-peptide–MHC-class-I ligand. These unique signals 'instruct' the precursor DP T cell to choose the correct lineage fate and develop into a CD4+ or CD8+ T cell. The selection model postulates that precursor DP T cells randomly choose a fate and lose expression of either CD4 or CD8. Further differentiation and survival depends on the cell having chosen correctly, so that it receives a signal from coordinate binding of the TCR and co-receptor to a self-peptide–MHC ligand. For TCRs that are specific for MHC class I, CD8 must be retained, whereas for TCRs with MHC class-II specificity, CD4 must be retained; the wrong choice dooms the cell at this checkpoint. Recent data indicate that a combination of these two models is a more accurate description of reality. The current 'strength of signal' model proposes that the intensity/duration of initial signalling dictates lineage choice; strong/long signalling leads to the CD4 pathway, whereas weaker/shorter signalling prompts the CD8 choice. This is generally correlated with MHC class-II versus class-I binding, respectively, because of differential association of LCK with the two co-receptors in DP thymocytes. A combination of negative selection and cell loss due to a failure to sustain signalling removes most of the cells that make 'incorrect' choices (overly strong MHC class-I reactivity that promotes CD4 lineage choice or very weak MHC class-II reactivity that leads to the CD8 lineage). The role of NOTCH proteins in this lineage-decision process remains controversial.

immunology