Abstract:Key Points T cells with αβ T-cell receptors (TCRs) respond to foreign antigen in the form of short peptides that are bound to MHC class I or class II proteins. These TCRs are generated by somatic DNA rearrangements and random chain pairing, and hence, lack predictable specificity for their ligands. Optimal signalling in response to MHC ligands requires co-engagement of the TCR and either a CD4 (MHC-class-II-binding) or CD8 (MHC-class-I-binding) co-receptor. Immature thymocytes express both CD4 and CD8, but mature functional T cells express the co-receptor molecule that has an MHC-class specificity that matches that of the cell's TCR. During T-cell differentiation in the thymus, CD4+CD8+ double-positive (DP) precursors must make a lineage decision to become CD4+ (helper) or CD8+ (cytotoxic) T cells. Two models have been proposed to explain how a T cell that expresses a TCR with an unpredictable specificity emerges from the thymus with the required match between the MHC-binding preferences of TCR and co-receptor. The instruction model postulates that TCR–CD4 binding of a self-peptide–MHC-class-II ligand generates a signal that is distinct from that produced on co-binding of a TCR and CD8 molecule to a self-peptide–MHC-class-I ligand. These unique signals 'instruct' the precursor DP T cell to choose the correct lineage fate and develop into a CD4+ or CD8+ T cell. The selection model postulates that precursor DP T cells randomly choose a fate and lose expression of either CD4 or CD8. Further differentiation and survival depends on the cell having chosen correctly, so that it receives a signal from coordinate binding of the TCR and co-receptor to a self-peptide–MHC ligand. For TCRs that are specific for MHC class I, CD8 must be retained, whereas for TCRs with MHC class-II specificity, CD4 must be retained; the wrong choice dooms the cell at this checkpoint. Recent data indicate that a combination of these two models is a more accurate description of reality. The current 'strength of signal' model proposes that the intensity/duration of initial signalling dictates lineage choice; strong/long signalling leads to the CD4 pathway, whereas weaker/shorter signalling prompts the CD8 choice. This is generally correlated with MHC class-II versus class-I binding, respectively, because of differential association of LCK with the two co-receptors in DP thymocytes. A combination of negative selection and cell loss due to a failure to sustain signalling removes most of the cells that make 'incorrect' choices (overly strong MHC class-I reactivity that promotes CD4 lineage choice or very weak MHC class-II reactivity that leads to the CD8 lineage). The role of NOTCH proteins in this lineage-decision process remains controversial.

Homeostasis-Stimulated Proliferation Drives Naive T Cells to Differentiate Directly into Memory T Cells

Naïve to Memory T-cell Differentiation During Homeostasis-Driven Proliferation

Different Contributions Of Thymopoiesis And Homeostasis-Driven Proliferation To The Reconstitution Of Naive And Memory T Cell Compartments

Regulatory dendritic cells program generation of interleukin-4–producing alternative memory CD4 T cells with suppressive activity

Precursor central memory versus effector cell fate and naïve CD4+ T cell heterogeneity

Excess generation and activation of naturally arising memory-phenotype CD4+ T lymphocytes are inhibited by regulatory T cells in steady state

Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions

Competition for self-peptide-MHC complexes and cytokines between naive and memory CD8+ T cells expressing the same or different T cell receptors.

Intrinsic Differences in the Proliferation of Naive and Memory Human B Cells as a Mechanism for Enhanced Secondary Immune Responses1

Naturally arising memory-phenotype CD4 + T lymphocytes contain an undifferentiated population that can generate T H 1, T H 17, and T reg cells

Culture-differentiated CD8(+) T cells acquire innate memory-like traits and respond to a pathogen-associated molecule

CD4(+) T cells stimulate memory CD8(+) T cell expansion via acquired pMHC I complexes and costimulatory molecules, and IL-2 secretion.

Lineage relationships, homeostasis, and recall capacities of central– and effector–memory CD8 T cells in vivo

E2A-regulated epigenetic landscape promotes memory CD8 T cell differentiation

T-cell development and the CD4–CD8 lineage decision

A novel memory-like Tfh cell subset is precursor to effector Tfh cells in recall immune responses

Lineage relationship and protective immunity of memory CD8 T cell subsets

CD8+ memory T cells (CD44high, Ly-6C+) are more sensitive than naive cells to (CD44low, Ly-6C-) to TCR/CD8 signaling in response to antigen

Homeostatic T Cell Proliferation in a T Cell-Dendritic Cell Coculture System.

Dysfunctional memory CD8+ T cells after priming in the absence of the cell cycle regulator E2F4

Selective expression of IL-7 receptor on memory T cells identifies early CD40L-dependent generation of distinct CD8+ memory T cell subsets