Abstract:MBCs (MBCs) generated in T-dependent immune responses can persist for a lifetime and rapidly react upon secondary antigen exposure to differentiate into plasma cells (PCs) and/or to improve the affinity of their BCR through new rounds of hypermutation in germinal centers (GCs). The fate of a MBC in secondary immune reactions appears to depend upon multiple parameters, whose understanding is mandatory for the design of efficient vaccine strategies. We followed the behavior of MBCs in recall responses to SRBCs using an inducible AID fate mapping mouse model in which B cells engaged in a germinal center (GC) response are irreversibly labeled upon simultaneous tamoxifen ingestion and immunization. We used different schemes of mouse immunization and tamoxifen feeding in adoptive-transfer experiments of total splenic B cells into congenic mice that have been pre-immunized or not, to assess the contribution of the different effector subsets in a physiological competitive context. We were able to show that naive B cells can differentiate into GC B cells with kinetics similar to MBCs in the presence of previously activated T follicular helper (T FH ) cells and a primed microenvironment. We also showed that MBCs are recruited into secondary GCs, together with naive B cells. In contrast, PC differentiation, which dominated secondary MBC responses, was not dependent upon a previous T FH activation. We observed that the presence of persisting germinal centers and circulating antibody levels are key factors determining the germinal center versus plasma cell fate in a recall response. Notably, disruption of persistent germinal center structures by a lymphotoxin beta-receptor fusion protein or a longer timing between the prime and the boost, which correlated with reduced antigen-specific immunoglobulin levels in serum, were two conditions with an opposite impact, respectively inhibiting or promoting a GC fate for MBCs. Altogether, these studies highlight the complexity of recall responses, whose outcome varies according to immunization contexts.

Intrinsic Differences in the Proliferation of Naive and Memory Human B Cells as a Mechanism for Enhanced Secondary Immune Responses1

Induction of Autonomous Memory Alveolar Macrophages Requires T Cell Help and is Critical to Trained Immunity

Memory in the B–cell compartment: antibody affinity maturation

B cell intrinsic and extrinsic factors impacting memory recall responses to SRBC challenge

Differential response of IgM and IgG memory B cell populations to CD40L: insights of T cell - memory B cell interactions

Memory B cells and plasma cells: The differentiative continuum of humoral immunity

A continuum of CD4+ T cell “help” defines Memory B cell fate

Reactivation of IgG-switched memory B cells by BCR-intrinsic signal amplification promotes IgG antibody production

No Receptor Stands Alone: IgG B-cell Receptor Intrinsic and Extrinsic Mechanisms Contribute to Antibody Memory.

Two distinct durable human class-switched memory B cell populations are induced by vaccination and infection

Long-term B cell memory emerges at uniform relative rates in the human immune response

Selectivity of Toll-like receptor stimulation in human B cells (HUM8P.350)

Understanding Memory B Cell Selection

Conserved epigenetic programming and enhanced heme metabolism drive memory B cell reactivation

Polarization of the memory B cell response

Homeostasis-Stimulated Proliferation Drives Naive T Cells to Differentiate Directly into Memory T Cells

Innate memory of human Vγ2Vδ2 T cells: Distinct proliferative, migratory and tumorcidal capabilities of γδ memory subsets (52.17)

Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions

Encoding Immunological Memory in the Initiation of B-Cell Receptor Signaling

CD8+ memory T cells (CD44high, Ly-6C+) are more sensitive than naive cells to (CD44low, Ly-6C-) to TCR/CD8 signaling in response to antigen

Generation of memory B cells and their reactivation