Divergent molecular networks program functionally distinct CD8 + skin-resident memory T cells
Simone L Park,Susan N Christo,Alexandria C Wells,Luke C Gandolfo,Ali Zaid,Yannick O Alexandre,Thomas N Burn,Jan Schröder,Nicholas Collins,Seong-Ji Han,Stéphane M Guillaume,Maximilien Evrard,Clara Castellucci,Brooke Davies,Maleika Osman,Andreas Obers,Keely M McDonald,Huimeng Wang,Scott N Mueller,George Kannourakis,Stuart P Berzins,Lisa A Mielke,Francis R Carbone,Axel Kallies,Terence P Speed,Yasmine Belkaid,Laura K Mackay,Simone L. Park,Susan N. Christo,Alexandria C. Wells,Luke C. Gandolfo,Yannick O. Alexandre,Thomas N. Burn,Stéphane M. Guillaume,Keely M. McDonald,Scott N. Mueller,Stuart P. Berzins,Lisa A. Mielke,Francis R. Carbone,Terence P. Speed,Laura K. Mackay
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adi8885
IF: 56.9
2023-12-01
Science
Abstract:Skin-resident CD8 + T cells include distinct interferon-γ–producing [tissue-resident memory T type 1 (T RM 1)] and interleukin-17 (IL-17)–producing (T RM 17) subsets that differentially contribute to immune responses. However, whether these populations use common mechanisms to establish tissue residence is unknown. In this work, we show that T RM 1 and T RM 17 cells navigate divergent trajectories to acquire tissue residency in the skin. T RM 1 cells depend on a T-bet–Hobit–IL-15 axis, whereas T RM 17 cells develop independently of these factors. Instead, c-Maf commands a tissue-resident program in T RM 17 cells parallel to that induced by Hobit in T RM 1 cells, with an ICOS–c-Maf–IL-7 axis pivotal to T RM 17 cell commitment. Accordingly, by targeting this pathway, skin T RM 17 cells can be ablated without compromising their T RM 1 counterparts. Thus, skin-resident T cells rely on distinct molecular circuitries, which can be exploited to strategically modulate local immunity.
multidisciplinary sciences