Abstract:Background: Occupational segregation by gender is one of the major problems faced by professional women in the labor market. Since the sixties, psychological explanations point out that gender stereotypes are responsible for this persistent inequality in the workforce. Nevertheless, most of research has overlooked that emotions are particularly important as the discrimination faced by professional women is better explained by the ambivalent feelings they provoke than by stereotyping. Aim: The aim of this research is to analyse from the Stereotype Content Model (SCM, Fiske et al., 2002) and the Behaviors from Intergroup Affect and Stereotypes (BIAS) Map (Cuddy et al., 2007) whether cognitive, affective and behavioral components of prejudice act jointly to explain gender segregation in the labor market. Method: 1098 Spanish workers (59% women) from different occupational sectors were requested to rate how professional men and women in high (leaders) and low status (secretaries) positions who work in male (high-tech company) and female-dominated (health company) occupations are perceived (stereotypes), as well as the affective responses and the behavioral tendencies that they arouse. Data analyses: Two analyses of variance (a) and two ANOVAs with repeated measures (b) were carried out to analyze the effect of occupational status (high vs. low), type of company (high-tech vs. health) and workers' sex (men vs. women) on: (a) the social structural variables (status and competition), (b) on the stereotyped dimensions (competence and warmth) and (c) on emotions (admiration, envy and contempt). Finally, mediational analyses were carried out to examine the link between stereotypes, emotions, and behavioral tendencies. Results: The most striking results show that (a) competition and status differentiate leaders and secretaries, (b) men leaders are rated as more competent and less warm than secretaries, whereas women leaders are viewed as more competent than women secretaries but with equivalent warmth, and (c) admiration and envy predict behavioral tendencies, but restricted to professional men regardless of organizational context. Conclusion: Results reveal that cognitive, affective and behavioral components of prejudice act jointly to explain discrimination against women in the workplace. Findings are discussed according to the SCM and the BIAS Map.

The effect of research method type on stereotypes' content: A brief research report

Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences

A systematic literature review of the stereotype content model in the fields of psychology and marketing: main themes examined in the literature and an agenda for future research in marketing

The Audience-Tuning Effect of Negative Stereotypes in Communication

Understanding and Countering Stereotypes: A Computational Approach to the Stereotype Content Model

The ABC of stereotypes about groups: Agency/socioeconomic success, conservative-progressive beliefs, and communion

Computational Modeling of Stereotype Content in Text

Intergroup biases: a focus on stereotype content

A Robust Bias Mitigation Procedure Based on the Stereotype Content Model

A comparative study on culture-specific and cross-cultural aspects of intercultural relations in Hungary, Serbia, Czech Republic, and Germany

Warmth and competence in your face! Visual encoding of stereotype content

Social-Group-Agnostic Word Embedding Debiasing via the Stereotype Content Model

Differences in Explicit Stereotype Activation among Social Groups Based on the Stereotype Content Model: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence in Chinese Sample

Racial/ethnic and gender disparities in child protection decision-making: What role do stereotypes play?

The Distributed Semantic Representation and Activation Processes of the Implicit and Explicit Stereotypes: an Examination Based on the Perspective of Cognitive Neuroscience

The Effects of Occupational Status and Sex-Typed Jobs on the Evaluation of Men and Women

Building Socio-culturally Inclusive Stereotype Resources with Community Engagement

The Discuss about Ethical Stereotype Research

Evidence for the social role theory of stereotype content: observations of groups' roles shape stereotypes.

Measuring culture outside the head: a meta-analysis of individualism-collectivism in cultural products

Stereotype Content: Warmth and Competence Endure