Abstract:Concerns about gender bias in word embedding models have captured substantial attention in the algorithmic bias research literature. Other bias types however have received lesser amounts of scrutiny. This work describes a large-scale analysis of sentiment associations in popular word embedding models along the lines of gender and ethnicity but also along the less frequently studied dimensions of socioeconomic status, age, physical appearance, sexual orientation, religious sentiment and political leanings. Consistent with previous scholarly literature, this work has found systemic bias against given names popular among African-Americans in most embedding models examined. Gender bias in embedding models however appears to be multifaceted and often reversed in polarity to what has been regularly reported. Interestingly, using the common operationalization of the term <em>bias</em> in the fairness literature, novel types of so far unreported bias types in word embedding models have also been identified. Specifically, the popular embedding models analyzed here display negative biases against middle and working-class socioeconomic status, male children, senior citizens, plain physical appearance and intellectual phenomena such as Islamic religious faith, non-religiosity and conservative political orientation. Reasons for the paradoxical underreporting of these bias types in the relevant literature are probably manifold but widely held blind spots when searching for algorithmic bias and a lack of widespread technical jargon to unambiguously describe a variety of algorithmic associations could conceivably be playing a role. The causal origins for the multiplicity of loaded associations attached to distinct demographic groups within embedding models are often unclear but the heterogeneity of said associations and their potential multifactorial roots raises doubts about the validity of grouping them all under the umbrella term <em>bias</em>. Richer and more fine-grained terminology as well as a more comprehensive exploration of the bias landscape could help the fairness epistemic community to characterize and neutralize algorithmic discrimination more efficiently.

Social-Group-Agnostic Word Embedding Debiasing via the Stereotype Content Model

A Robust Bias Mitigation Procedure Based on the Stereotype Content Model

Detecting and Mitigating Indirect Stereotypes in Word Embeddings

Mitigating Gender Bias in Contextual Word Embeddings

Understanding and Countering Stereotypes: A Computational Approach to the Stereotype Content Model

"Thy algorithm shalt not bear false witness": An Evaluation of Multiclass Debiasing Methods on Word Embeddings

From Prejudice to Parity: A New Approach to Debiasing Large Language Model Word Embeddings

Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings

Social Debiasing for Fair Multi-modal LLMs

Wide range screening of algorithmic bias in word embedding models using large sentiment lexicons reveals underreported bias types

Leveraging Prototypical Representations for Mitigating Social Bias without Demographic Information

Gender-preserving Debiasing for Pre-trained Word Embeddings

On Measuring and Mitigating Biased Inferences of Word Embeddings

Debiasing Word Embeddings with Nonlinear Geometry

Stereotype Content: Warmth and Competence Endure

Robustness and Reliability of Gender Bias Assessment in Word Embeddings: The Role of Base Pairs

Debiasing Sentence Embedders through Contrastive Word Pairs

Computational Modeling of Stereotype Content in Text

Warmth and competence in your face! Visual encoding of stereotype content

Stereotype and Skew: Quantifying Gender Bias in Pre-trained and Fine-tuned Language Models

Unsupervised Mitigating Gender Bias by Character Components: A Case Study of Chinese Word Embedding