Abstract:Concerns about gender bias in word embedding models have captured substantial attention in the algorithmic bias research literature. Other bias types however have received lesser amounts of scrutiny. This work describes a large-scale analysis of sentiment associations in popular word embedding models along the lines of gender and ethnicity but also along the less frequently studied dimensions of socioeconomic status, age, physical appearance, sexual orientation, religious sentiment and political leanings. Consistent with previous scholarly literature, this work has found systemic bias against given names popular among African-Americans in most embedding models examined. Gender bias in embedding models however appears to be multifaceted and often reversed in polarity to what has been regularly reported. Interestingly, using the common operationalization of the term <em>bias</em> in the fairness literature, novel types of so far unreported bias types in word embedding models have also been identified. Specifically, the popular embedding models analyzed here display negative biases against middle and working-class socioeconomic status, male children, senior citizens, plain physical appearance and intellectual phenomena such as Islamic religious faith, non-religiosity and conservative political orientation. Reasons for the paradoxical underreporting of these bias types in the relevant literature are probably manifold but widely held blind spots when searching for algorithmic bias and a lack of widespread technical jargon to unambiguously describe a variety of algorithmic associations could conceivably be playing a role. The causal origins for the multiplicity of loaded associations attached to distinct demographic groups within embedding models are often unclear but the heterogeneity of said associations and their potential multifactorial roots raises doubts about the validity of grouping them all under the umbrella term <em>bias</em>. Richer and more fine-grained terminology as well as a more comprehensive exploration of the bias landscape could help the fairness epistemic community to characterize and neutralize algorithmic discrimination more efficiently.

Wide range screening of algorithmic bias in word embedding models using large sentiment lexicons reveals underreported bias types

Gender Bias in Word Embeddings: A Comprehensive Analysis of Frequency, Syntax, and Semantics

Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Setting

Robustness and Reliability of Gender Bias Assessment in Word Embeddings: The Role of Base Pairs

Detecting Emergent Intersectional Biases: Contextualized Word Embeddings Contain a Distribution of Human-like Biases

Evaluating Biased Attitude Associations of Language Models in an Intersectional Context

Attenuating Bias in Word Vectors

A World Full of Stereotypes? Further Investigation on Origin and Gender Bias in Multi-Lingual Word Embeddings

Regional Negative Bias in Word Embeddings Predicts Racial Animus--but only via Name Frequency

Global Voices, Local Biases: Socio-Cultural Prejudices across Languages

Mitigating Gender Bias in Contextual Word Embeddings

Negative Associations in Word Embeddings Predict Anti-black Bias across Regions-but Only via Name Frequency

Are AI systems biased against the poor? A machine learning analysis using Word2Vec and GloVe embeddings

Gender Bias in Contextualized Word Embeddings

No Word Embedding Model Is Perfect: Evaluating the Representation Accuracy for Social Bias in the Media

Are Models Biased on Text without Gender-related Language?

The Birth of Bias: A case study on the evolution of gender bias in an English language model

"Thy algorithm shalt not bear false witness": An Evaluation of Multiclass Debiasing Methods on Word Embeddings

Bias in Text Embedding Models

Gender Bias in Text: Labeled Datasets and Lexicons

Bias Against 93 Stigmatized Groups in Masked Language Models and Downstream Sentiment Classification Tasks