Abstract:Concerns about gender bias in word embedding models have captured substantial attention in the algorithmic bias research literature. Other bias types however have received lesser amounts of scrutiny. This work describes a large-scale analysis of sentiment associations in popular word embedding models along the lines of gender and ethnicity but also along the less frequently studied dimensions of socioeconomic status, age, physical appearance, sexual orientation, religious sentiment and political leanings. Consistent with previous scholarly literature, this work has found systemic bias against given names popular among African-Americans in most embedding models examined. Gender bias in embedding models however appears to be multifaceted and often reversed in polarity to what has been regularly reported. Interestingly, using the common operationalization of the term <em>bias</em> in the fairness literature, novel types of so far unreported bias types in word embedding models have also been identified. Specifically, the popular embedding models analyzed here display negative biases against middle and working-class socioeconomic status, male children, senior citizens, plain physical appearance and intellectual phenomena such as Islamic religious faith, non-religiosity and conservative political orientation. Reasons for the paradoxical underreporting of these bias types in the relevant literature are probably manifold but widely held blind spots when searching for algorithmic bias and a lack of widespread technical jargon to unambiguously describe a variety of algorithmic associations could conceivably be playing a role. The causal origins for the multiplicity of loaded associations attached to distinct demographic groups within embedding models are often unclear but the heterogeneity of said associations and their potential multifactorial roots raises doubts about the validity of grouping them all under the umbrella term <em>bias</em>. Richer and more fine-grained terminology as well as a more comprehensive exploration of the bias landscape could help the fairness epistemic community to characterize and neutralize algorithmic discrimination more efficiently.

Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Setting

What's in a Name? Reducing Bias in Bios without Access to Protected Attributes

Gender Bias in Big Data Analysis

Gender Bias in AI Recruitment Systems: A Sociological-and Data Science-based Case Study

Wide range screening of algorithmic bias in word embedding models using large sentiment lexicons reveals underreported bias types

Uncovering Latent Biases in Text: Method and Application to Peer Review

Mitigating Gender Bias in Machine Learning Data Sets

Multi-Dimensional Gender Bias Classification

Are Models Biased on Text without Gender-related Language?

What You See Is What You Get? The Impact of Representation Criteria on Human Bias in Hiring

Data Bias According to Bipol: Men are Naturally Right and It is the Role of Women to Follow Their Lead

Gender Bias in Neural Natural Language Processing

Gender bias and stereotypes in Large Language Models

Evaluating Gender, Racial, and Age Biases in Large Language Models: A Comparative Analysis of Occupational and Crime Scenarios

Causally Testing Gender Bias in LLMs: A Case Study on Occupational Bias

Evaluating Gender Bias in Natural Language Inference

Measuring Gender and Racial Biases in Large Language Models

Interpretable bias mitigation for textual data: Reducing gender bias in patient notes while maintaining classification performance

Bias in Machine Learning Software: Why? How? What to do?

Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings