Abstract:Concerns about gender bias in word embedding models have captured substantial attention in the algorithmic bias research literature. Other bias types however have received lesser amounts of scrutiny. This work describes a large-scale analysis of sentiment associations in popular word embedding models along the lines of gender and ethnicity but also along the less frequently studied dimensions of socioeconomic status, age, physical appearance, sexual orientation, religious sentiment and political leanings. Consistent with previous scholarly literature, this work has found systemic bias against given names popular among African-Americans in most embedding models examined. Gender bias in embedding models however appears to be multifaceted and often reversed in polarity to what has been regularly reported. Interestingly, using the common operationalization of the term <em>bias</em> in the fairness literature, novel types of so far unreported bias types in word embedding models have also been identified. Specifically, the popular embedding models analyzed here display negative biases against middle and working-class socioeconomic status, male children, senior citizens, plain physical appearance and intellectual phenomena such as Islamic religious faith, non-religiosity and conservative political orientation. Reasons for the paradoxical underreporting of these bias types in the relevant literature are probably manifold but widely held blind spots when searching for algorithmic bias and a lack of widespread technical jargon to unambiguously describe a variety of algorithmic associations could conceivably be playing a role. The causal origins for the multiplicity of loaded associations attached to distinct demographic groups within embedding models are often unclear but the heterogeneity of said associations and their potential multifactorial roots raises doubts about the validity of grouping them all under the umbrella term <em>bias</em>. Richer and more fine-grained terminology as well as a more comprehensive exploration of the bias landscape could help the fairness epistemic community to characterize and neutralize algorithmic discrimination more efficiently.

Gender Bias in Word Embeddings: A Comprehensive Analysis of Frequency, Syntax, and Semantics

Analysis of Gender Bias in Social Perception and Judgement Using Chinese Word Embeddings

Gender Bias in Contextualized Word Embeddings

Robustness and Reliability of Gender Bias Assessment in Word Embeddings: The Role of Base Pairs

Gender Stereotypes in Natural Language: Word Embeddings Show Robust Consistency Across Child and Adult Language Corpora of More Than 65 Million Words

The Undesirable Dependence on Frequency of Gender Bias Metrics Based on Word Embeddings

Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings

Measuring Gender Bias in Word Embeddings of Gendered Languages Requires Disentangling Grammatical Gender Signals

Wide range screening of algorithmic bias in word embedding models using large sentiment lexicons reveals underreported bias types

Exploring Human Gender Stereotypes with Word Association Test.

Examining Gender Bias in Languages with Grammatical Gender

Attenuating Bias in Word Vectors

Bias in Text Embedding Models

Grammatical gender associations outweigh topical gender bias in crosslinguistic word embeddings

Examining the Presence of Gender Bias in Customer Reviews Using Word Embedding

Gender bias in (non)-contextual clinical word embeddings for stereotypical medical categories

Gender Bias Hidden Behind Chinese Word Embeddings: The Case of Chinese Adjectives

Mitigating Gender Bias in Contextual Word Embeddings

Gender Bias in Multilingual Embeddings and Cross-Lingual Transfer

Gender Bias in Neural Natural Language Processing

Nurse is Closer to Woman than Surgeon? Mitigating Gender-Biased Proximities in Word Embeddings