Abstract:Background: Occupational segregation by gender is one of the major problems faced by professional women in the labor market. Since the sixties, psychological explanations point out that gender stereotypes are responsible for this persistent inequality in the workforce. Nevertheless, most of research has overlooked that emotions are particularly important as the discrimination faced by professional women is better explained by the ambivalent feelings they provoke than by stereotyping. Aim: The aim of this research is to analyse from the Stereotype Content Model (SCM, Fiske et al., 2002) and the Behaviors from Intergroup Affect and Stereotypes (BIAS) Map (Cuddy et al., 2007) whether cognitive, affective and behavioral components of prejudice act jointly to explain gender segregation in the labor market. Method: 1098 Spanish workers (59% women) from different occupational sectors were requested to rate how professional men and women in high (leaders) and low status (secretaries) positions who work in male (high-tech company) and female-dominated (health company) occupations are perceived (stereotypes), as well as the affective responses and the behavioral tendencies that they arouse. Data analyses: Two analyses of variance (a) and two ANOVAs with repeated measures (b) were carried out to analyze the effect of occupational status (high vs. low), type of company (high-tech vs. health) and workers' sex (men vs. women) on: (a) the social structural variables (status and competition), (b) on the stereotyped dimensions (competence and warmth) and (c) on emotions (admiration, envy and contempt). Finally, mediational analyses were carried out to examine the link between stereotypes, emotions, and behavioral tendencies. Results: The most striking results show that (a) competition and status differentiate leaders and secretaries, (b) men leaders are rated as more competent and less warm than secretaries, whereas women leaders are viewed as more competent than women secretaries but with equivalent warmth, and (c) admiration and envy predict behavioral tendencies, but restricted to professional men regardless of organizational context. Conclusion: Results reveal that cognitive, affective and behavioral components of prejudice act jointly to explain discrimination against women in the workplace. Findings are discussed according to the SCM and the BIAS Map.

The mental representation of occupational stereotypes is driven as much by their affective as by their semantic content

The neural representation of stereotype content

Warmth and competence in your face! Visual encoding of stereotype content

Extracting Social Meaning from a Face: The Neural Substrates and Behavioral Repercussions of Mind Perception

The ABC of stereotypes about groups: Agency/socioeconomic success, conservative-progressive beliefs, and communion

Stereotypes: A source of bias in affective and empathic forecasting

The Effects of Occupational Status and Sex-Typed Jobs on the Evaluation of Men and Women

Stereotypes, emotions, and behaviors associated with animals: A causal test of the stereotype content model and BIAS map

Prejudice, stereotypes, and labeling effects: Sources of bias in person perception.

Neural representations of others’ traits predict social decisions

An Empirical Investigation of Role Schemata: Occupations and Personality Characteristics

The early negative bias of social semantics: evidence from behavioral and ERP studies

People perception and stereotype-based responding: task context matters

Evidence for the social role theory of stereotype content: observations of groups' roles shape stereotypes.

Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components.

The neural representation of social status in the extended face-processing network

Does attitude importance moderate the effects of person-first language? A registered report

Intergroup biases: a focus on stereotype content

Emotional contextual effects of face perception: a test of the affective realism hypothesis

More than labels: Neural representations of emotion words are widely distributed across the brain

The role of language in the experience and perception of emotion: a neuroimaging meta-analysis