Abstract:Disparities in outcomes across social groups pervade human societies and are of central interest to the social sciences. How people treat others is known to depend on a multitude of factors (e.g., others' gender, ethnicity, appearance) even when these should be irrelevant. However, despite substantial progress, much remains unknown regarding (i) the set of mechanisms shaping people's behavior toward members of different social groups and (ii) the extent to which these mechanisms can explain the structure of existing societal disparities. Here, we show in a set of experiments the important interplay between social perception and social valuation processes in explaining how people treat members of different social groups. Building on the idea that stereotypes can be organized onto basic, underlying dimensions, we first found using laboratory economic games that quantitative variation in stereotypes about different groups' warmth and competence translated meaningfully into resource allocation behavior toward those groups. Computational modeling further revealed that these effects operated via the interaction of social perception and social valuation processes, with warmth and competence exerting diverging effects on participants' preferences for equitable distributions of resources. This framework successfully predicted behavior toward members of a diverse set of social groups across samples and successfully generalized to predict societal disparities documented in labor and education settings with substantial precision and accuracy. Together, these results highlight a common set of mechanisms linking social group information to social treatment and show how preexisting, societally shared assumptions about different social groups can produce and reinforce societal disparities.

Prejudice, stereotypes, and labeling effects: Sources of bias in person perception.

Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components.

The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes.

Perceived controllability of group membership does not moderate individuating information effects in implicit person perception

Differentiation in social perception: Why later-encountered individuals are described more negatively.

People perception and stereotype-based responding: task context matters

Does attitude importance moderate the effects of person-first language? A registered report

Stereotypes: A source of bias in affective and empathic forecasting

Effects of Intergroup Contact and Political Predispositions on Prejudice: Role of Intergroup Emotions

Intergroup biases: a focus on stereotype content

Confirmation biases in selective exposure to political online information: Source bias vs. content bias

Predicting Human Behavior Toward Members of Different Social Groups.

Bright Minds and Dark Attitudes

An Unintentional, Robust, and Replicable Pro-Black Bias in Social Judgment

Prejudice model 1.0: A predictive model of prejudice.

The Effects of Prior Salience on Individual Information Processing: An Empirical Study on Controversy Judgment

Overconfidence and Prejudice

Behavioral and Neural Evidence for an Evaluative Bias against Other People's Mundane Interracial Encounters.

Gender/Sex Categories and Gendered Cues in People Perception: The Influence of Gender/Sex Ratio and Gendered Appearance on Group Judgments

The Role of Diagnostic Models in Prejudice Toward People With Borderline Personality Disorder: An Experimental Investigation

Partisan Bias in Political Judgment