Abstract:The atomic hydrogen adsorption on Ir (111) surface and in its subsurface with coverage front 0.11 monolayer (ML) to 2 ML is investigated by using density functional calculations with the generalized gradient approximation (GGA), the diffusion for hydrogen into the subsurface region at 0.25 ML coverage is also calculated. At all sites Of our calculations, the most favorable site is hydrogen oil top of Ir (111). The corresponding binding energy of a hydrogen atom at this site is 2.71 eV/H atom at the coverage of 0.25 ML, favored by about 0.05 eV over the next most stable site, the fee site. For on-surface adsorption, the binding energy decreases very slowly for all of the sites as the hydrogen covet-age increases from 0.25 to 1.00 ML, it indicates that there is only a weak repulsive interaction between the adsorbates. For the coverage range of 0.11-0.25 ML, the binding energy increases evidently, suggesting an attractive interaction between adsorbates. Compared to on-surface hydrogen adsorption, subsurface hydrogen adsorption is energetically unfavorable and takes place when on-surface hydrogen coverage is greater than full monolayer. For mixed structures at full monolayer both of surface and subsurface, it is found that the most favorable site is the hcp/octa site with a binding energy 2.35 eV/H atom. So when full monolayer hydrogen atoms adsorbed in the hcp site on the surface, H begins to adsorb on the subsurface in the octa site. Compared to hydrogen adsorption on other transition metals (Pt, Rh, Pd, Co, and Ni) with localized feature, it is found hydrogen adsorption on Ir (111) shows some delocalized nature. Meanwhile, at 0.25 ML coverage for H adsorption on Ir(111), the desorption energy for hydrogen from the Ir surface is found to be 0.96 eV, the calculated barrier for hydrogen from hcp to fee is 0.02 eV, and penetration into the Subsurface region front the on surface fee site is 1.26 eV.

Is there any substrate that is better than Ir(1 0 0) for diamond nucleation?

Comparison of heteroepitaxial diamond nucleation and growth on roughened and flat Ir/SrTiO 3 substrates

Comparison of Heteroepitaxial Diamond Nucleation and Growth on Roughened and Flat Ir/SrTiO3 Substrates

Heteroepitaxial Diamond Nucleation and Growth on Iridium: First-principle Calculation

Virtues of Ir(1 0 0) Substrate on Diamond Epitaxial Growth: First-principle Calculation and XPS Study

Diamond growth on Ir/CaF2/Si substrates

Pre-planting amorphous carbon films based on Ir composite substrates for diamond nucleation

Cu-Ir thin film alloy as a potential substrate for the heteroepitaxial diamond growth

Heteroepitaxy growth of single crystal diamond on Ir/Pd/Al2O3 (11–20) substrate

Contrasting Behavior of Carbon Nucleation in the Initial Stages of Graphene Epitaxial Growth on Stepped Metal Surfaces

Role of Surface Chemistry in Determining the Heteroepitaxial Growth of Ir Films on A-Plane Α-Al2o3 Single Crystals

Heteroepitaxy of single crystal diamond on Ir buffered KTaO3 (001) substrates

Heteroepitaxy of single crystal diamond on Ir buffered KTaO 3 (001) substrates

First-Principles Investigation of Surface and Subsurface H Adsorption on Ir(111)

Atomic-level Investigation of CHxand C2Hxadsorption on Β-Sic (111) Surface for CVD Diamond Growth from DFT Calculations

Probable Optimum Hydrogen Coverage of Chemical Vapor Deposited Diamond (111) Surface

Heteroepitaxial Growth of Single Crystal Diamond Films on Iridium: Procedure and Mechanism

Effect of Substrate Surface Reconstruction on Interaction with Adsorbates: Pt on 6H-Sic(0001).

Thickness Impact on the Morphology, Strain Relaxation and Defects of Diamond Heteroepitaxially Grown on Ir/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> Substrates

Diamond Nucleation on Smooth Si3n4-Coated Substrate

Diamond/Ir/SrTiO3: A material combination for improved heteroepitaxial diamond films