Abstract:Contact theory holds that increased contact between members of different groups can improve intergroup attitudes and reduce prejudice if it meets certain quality criteria, such as equal status, common goals, and cooperation within the contact situation. It is now emerging that even extended contact, or the mere knowledge that an ingroup member has a close relationship with an outgroup member, can lead to more positive intergroup attitudes. However, in South African society optimal contact is uncommon because most social spaces and structures are governed by strong norms of microsegregation that ensure that genuine optimal contact is uncommon. Given that multiracial families exemplify most features of optimal contact while radically challenging social norms of segregation, they may be important nodes for effective prejudice-reducing contact in South African society. This exploratory study investigated the extent to which general contact with people of other races, direct contact with multiracial families (i.e. personally knowing a member of a multiracial family), and extended contact with multiracial families (i.e. knowing someone who knows a member of a multiracial family) predicted reduced prejudice, reconciliatory race-policy attitudes and reduced intergroup threat. The results show that all three forms of contact predicted significantly reduced prejudice and that direct contact with multiracial families significantly predicted reduced prejudice over and above the effect of general interracial contact. Therefore we argue that contact researchers should consider more carefully whether normatively supported contact or radically norm-violating forms of contact optimally disrupt practices of microsegregation. Additionally, we argue that multiracial romantic relationships and families deserve increased attention and support as important nodes of prejudice reduction in South African society. However, general contact was also associated with reduced support for race-based social policies which supports the argument that the prejudice-reducing effects of interracial contact may be at least partially offset by other effects that may hinder broader social change.

Intergroup Contact is Related to Evaluations of Interracial Peer Exclusion in African American Students

Intergroup contact and evaluations of race-based exclusion in urban minority children and adolescents

It is Who You Know That Counts: Intergroup Contact and Judgments about Race-Based Exclusion

Evaluations of Interracial Peer Encounters by Majority and Minority U.S. Children and Adolescents

Intergroup contact in context: The mediating role of social norms and group-based perceptions on the contact–prejudice link

Cross-race peer relations and friendship quality

Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three european countries.

Intergroup Contact Theory: Past, Present, and Future

Intergroup contact is reliably associated with reduced prejudice, even in the face of group threat and discrimination.

Interracial roommate relationships: an experimental field test of the contact hypothesis

Majority group belonging without minority group distancing? Minority experiences of intergroup contact and inequality

How contact is related to awareness of discrimination against women of color

Multiracial Families and Contact Theory in South Africa: Does Direct and Extended Contact Facilitated by Multiracial Families Predict Reduced Prejudice?

Cross‐group contact predicts positive beliefs about girls' and Black peers' STEM abilities and occupational prospects

Peer inclusion and school equality norm associations with intergroup contact, and academic self‐efficacy amongst ethnic majority and ethnic minority youth

Effects of group membership, intergroup competition, and out-group ethnicity on children’s ratings of in-group and out-group similarity and positivity

What will the others think? In-group norms as a mediator of the effects of intergroup contact

Effects of intergroup contact on explicit and implicit outgroup attitudes: A longitudinal field study with majority and minority group members

Negativity bias in intergroup contact: Meta-analytical evidence that bad is stronger than good, especially when people have the opportunity and motivation to opt out of contact.

The Longitudinal Relationship Between Youth Intergroup Contact and Social Cohesion Outcomes in Two Divided Societies

Teaching tolerance or acting tolerant? Evaluating skills- and contact-based prejudice reduction interventions among Palestinian-Israeli and Jewish-Israeli youth