Abstract:Racial microaggressions often occur in U.S. higher education. However, less is known about how White American students reason about their evaluations of racial microaggressions. The current study investigated how 213 White college students (54.46% cisgender women) attending a PWI in the Southeast U.S. in the Fall of 2019 justified their evaluations of the acceptability of racial microaggressions presented in vignettes. Following Social Domain Theory, to assess participants' social reasoning, we conducted quantitative content analysis of participants' open-ended justifications for their evaluations. Multiple regression analyses revealed that participants were less likely to evaluate racial microaggressions as negative the more they employed justifications focused on 1) assuming that the behaviors in the situation followed conventions of the classroom, 2) judging the professor's response as correct, and 3) asserting that the behavior was likely to happen to anyone. Further, the higher participants' endorsement of color-blind attitudes the more likely they were to evaluate racial microaggressions as appropriate. However, reasoning centered on 1) assuming differential treatment based on race, 2) perceiving the behavior as harmful, and 3) considering the behavior was against conventional expectations was associated with finding racial microaggressions to be more negative. The current study highlights the value of investigating underlying reasoning behind evaluating racial microaggressions in addition to color-blind attitudes. The findings suggest that higher education professionals should consider interventions which pay particular attention to unpacking students' reasoning, untangling acceptance of Ethnocentric narratives and providing information that challenges classroom behaviors that, while potentially appearing conventional, in fact perpetuate harm through microaggressions.

Evaluations of Interracial Peer Encounters by Majority and Minority U.S. Children and Adolescents

Intergroup contact and evaluations of race-based exclusion in urban minority children and adolescents

Intergroup Contact is Related to Evaluations of Interracial Peer Exclusion in African American Students

It is Who You Know That Counts: Intergroup Contact and Judgments about Race-Based Exclusion

Predicting High School Minority Adolescents' Drinking from Their Exposure to White Schoolmates: Differences and Similarities among Hispanic, Black, and Asian U.S. Adolescents

Through the eyes of my peers: Sharing perceptions of unequal treatment in ethno-racially diverse classrooms

Japanese and American children's evaluations of peer exclusion, tolerance of differences, and prescriptions for conformity

Cross-race peer relations and friendship quality

White American Students' Recognition of Racial Microaggressions in Higher Education

When Societal Norms and Social Identity Collide: the Race Talk Dilemma for Racial Minority Children

Children's and adolescents' expectations, evaluations and reasoning about a bystander who challenges social exclusion within intragroup and intergroup peer contexts

Someone who knows and someone I trust: Investigating how and with whom U.S. 8- to 14-year-old youth seek to learn about racial inequality.

When Societal Norms and Social Identity Collide

"Honestly, they are just like us": U.S. parents choose middle-class gender and racial ingroup peers for their children

Racial Identity, Racial Discrimination, and Classroom Engagement Outcomes Among Black Girls and Boys in Predominantly Black and Predominantly White School Districts

What's Race Got to Do with It? Relationships Between Racial Match and School Psychologists' Perceptions in School-Based Consultation

Judgements of identity claims vary for monoracial and biracial people

Black adolescents' experiences with racial socialization, racial identity, and critical reflection of need for school change of racial inequity

White privilege and teacher perceptions of teacher-child relationship quality

"This kid looks like he has everything": 3- to 11-year-old children's concerns for fairness and social preferences when peers differ in social class and race

Adolescents' evaluations of peer and teacher unfair treatment in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics classes: Expected interventions