Abstract:Seventy years of research on intergroup contact, or face-to-face interactions between members of opposing social groups, demonstrates that positive contact typically reduces prejudice and increases social cohesion. Extant syntheses, however, have not considered the full breadth of contact valence (positive/negative) and have treated self-selection as a threat to validity. This research bridges intergroup contact theory with sequential sampling models of impression formation to assess contact effects across all valences. From the premise that positive versus negative contact instigates differential resampling of outgroup experiences when self-selection is possible, we advance and meta-analytically test new predictions for the moderation of valenced contact effects and negativity bias as a function of people's opportunity and motivation to self-select in and out of contact. Our random-effects synthesis of positive and negative intergroup contact studies (238 independent samples, 936 nested effects; total N = 152,985) found significant valenced contact effects: Positive contact systematically associates with lower prejudice, and negative contact associates with higher prejudice. Critically, the detrimental effect of negative contact is significantly larger than the benefit of positive contact. This negativity bias is particularly pronounced under conditions in which one can self-select, is motivated to avoid contact, among male-dominated and prejudiced samples, in contact with stigmatized, low status, low socioeconomic status outgroups, along nonconcealable stigma, with nonintimate contact partners in informal settings and in collectivistic societies. Considering individuals' motivation and opportunity to self-select, together with contact valence, therefore offers a more nuanced and integrated platform to design contact-based interventions and policies across varied contact ecologies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)

How contact is related to awareness of discrimination against women of color

Intergroup contact is reliably associated with reduced prejudice, even in the face of group threat and discrimination.

Beyond direct contact: The theoretical and societal relevance of indirect contact for improving intergroup relations

When the direct route is blocked: The extended contact pathway to improving intergroup relations

The benefit of contact for prejudice-prone individuals: The type of stigmatized outgroup matters

The Ties that Bind: Public Opinion and Linked Fate among Women of Color

Intergroup contact and evaluations of race-based exclusion in urban minority children and adolescents

Intergroup Contact is Related to Evaluations of Interracial Peer Exclusion in African American Students

Reducing prejudice in organizations: The role of intergroup contact, out-group homogeneity, and in-group size

Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three european countries.

The social patterning of vicarious discrimination: Implications for health equity

Who are you to me?: A relational approach to examining race-gender associations

Negativity bias in intergroup contact: Meta-analytical evidence that bad is stronger than good, especially when people have the opportunity and motivation to opt out of contact.

Centering Asian American Women’s Health: Prevalence of Health Care Discrimination and Associated Health Outcomes

Intergroup Contact Theory: Past, Present, and Future

Valuing diversity: An undervalued mediator of intergroup contact

How does contact valence and group salience affect outgroup attitudes in asynchronous computer mediated contact? Experiments on intergroup contact via social media posts

Reaching across social divides deliberately: Theoretical, political, and practical implications of intergroup contact volition for intergroup relations

Effects of Racial Demographics, Ideology, and Economic Threat on Majority Group Discrimination Claims

Specific emotions as mediators of the effect of intergroup contact on prejudice: findings across multiple participant and target groups

The impacts of direct-negative and indirect-negative contact experiences on the attitudes toward the police: focus on racial differences