Abstract:Background: Racial/ethnic minorities have higher incidence and mortality rates of liver cancer, or hepatocellular carcinoma, than non-Hispanic Whites. As such, the Washington-Baltimore Metropolitan Area Hepatitis B Virus (WB-HBV) Demonstration Project, a community-based participatory research (CBPR)-driven academic-community-government (ACG) partnership, was established in 2019 to address disparities and implement strategies to improve the HBV screening and vaccination infrastructure for at-risk communities. CBPR is a partnership of community members, organizational leaders, and academic researchers with a common aim to collectively share and contribute their input at every phase of the project. Herein, we describe the process evaluation of the WB-HBV Project and extract themes and insights to benefit future ACG partnerships and community-engaged research. The process evaluation has been conducted to determine whether CBPR-driven partnership and programmatic activities have been implemented as intended and have resulted in building expanded research capacity for future ACG partnership HBV community-level initiatives. Methods: A WB-HBV Project Task Force was convened and comprised of eight organizations: four community organizations, three government organizations, and one academic institution. Through a mixed-methods process evaluation, an online survey and key informant interviews were conducted to provide context for program implementation barriers and facilitators. Descriptive statistics were conducted, and interviews were recorded, transcribed, and thematically coded. Results: The survey was completed by 14 of 20 partnership members (70.0%): two academic, eight community, and four government members. Partnership members showed general agreement across 14 domains: organization and structure of meetings; trust; decisions; impact; general satisfaction; strategic planning; ACG policy impact; community-based participatory research and government; participation in meetings; assessment of participation; partnership operations and capacity; communication; challenges/limitations associated with ACG involvement; and benefits compared to challenges associated with ACG involvement. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 15 of the 20 members (75.0%): two academic, nine community, and four government members. Four themes emerged: partnership involvement, project goals and accomplishments, project challenges and barriers, and partnership involvement in government or policy. Conclusions: The process evaluation presents insights into developing strategies to enhance partnership functioning and increase the ability of present and future ACG partnerships to improve community health outcomes.

Sharing of grant funds between academic institutions and community partners in community-based participatory research

A funding initiative for community-based participatory research: lessons from the Harvard Catalyst Seed Grants

Investigating Academic Graph‐Based Factors Behind Funding Success in National Institutes of Health

Community and partner engagement in dissemination and implementation research at the National Institutes of Health: an analysis of recently funded studies and opportunities to advance the field

Perspectives of community members on community-based participatory research: A systematic literature review

Lessons Learned from the Implementation of a Shared Community-Academic HIV Prevention Intervention

Implementing community-based provider participation in research: an empirical study

Academic-Community Partnerships: Effectiveness Evaluated Beyond the Ivory Walls

Exploring theoretical mechanisms of community-engaged research: a multilevel cross-sectional national study of structural and relational practices in community-academic partnerships

Enhancing Capacity of Community–Academic Partnerships to Achieve Health Equity: Results From the CBPR Partnership Academy

Impact of Participatory Health Research: A Test of the Community-Based Participatory Research Conceptual Model

Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) to Enhance Participation of Racial/Ethnic Minorities in Clinical Trials: A 10-Year Systematic Review

Evolution of funding for collaborative health research towards higher-level patient-oriented research. A comparison of the European Union Framework Programmes to the program funding by the United States National Institutes of Health

Training Community Members in Public Health Research: Development and Implementation of a Community Participatory Research Pilot Project

Bronx Community Collaborative Opportunities for Research and Education: Implementation and Evaluation of a Community–Academic Partnership

Structural Community Governance: Importance for Community‐Academic Research Partnerships

Process evaluation of an academic-community-government partnership to reduce liver diseases attributable to hepatitis B virus

Use of community engagement strategies to increase research participation in practice-based research networks (PBRNs)

A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects

Evolution of priorities in strategic funding for collaborative health research. A comparison of the European Union Framework Programmes to the program funding by the United States National Institutes of Health

Examining Benefits of Academic-Community Research Team Training: Rochester's Suicide Prevention Training Institutes.