Abstract:Abstract Background Ineffective research-practice translation is a major challenge to population health improvement. This paper presents an international perspective on the barriers and facilitators associated with the uptake of and engagement in Dissemination and Implementation (D&I) research in the fields of physical activity and nutrition. Methods A mixed methods study involving participants from the International Society for Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (ISBNPA) network. Participants completed an online survey (May–July 2018) and/or participated in a focus group during the annual ISBNPA conference (June 2018). Descriptive statistics were generated for quantitative online and pre-focus group survey data. Fisher’s exact tests investigated associations of (i) length of time in academia, (ii) career stage and (iii) country of work, and agreement with ‘perceptions of D&I’. Qualitative data were analysed thematically. Results In total, 141 participants responded to the survey (76% female, 21% aged 35–39 years, 14 countries represented) and 25 participated in focus groups ( n = 3). Participants self-identified as having knowledge (48%), skills (53%) and experience supporting others (40%) to conduct D&I research. The majority (96%) perceived D&I was important, with 66% having organizational support for D&I, yet only 52% reported prioritizing D&I research. Perceptions of D&I differed by length of time in academia, career stage and country of work. Barriers included: (i) lack of D&I expertise; (ii) lack of organisational support/value for D&I; (iii) embedded scientific beliefs/culture; (iv) methodological challenges with D&I research; (v) funding/publishing priorities and; (vi) academic performance structures. Facilitators included: (i) increased presence/value of D&I; (ii) collective advocacy; (iii) organisational support for D&I; (iv) recruitment of D&I scientists and; (v) restructure of academic performance models, funding/publishing criteria. Conclusions Individual, organisational and system-wide factors hindered academics’ engagement with and support for D&I research, which was perceived to reduce opportunities for research-practice translation. Factors were mostly consistent across countries and individual career stages/time spent in academia. Embedding D&I early within academic training, and system-wide reorientation of academic performance and funding structures to promote and facilitate D&I research, are some of the necessary actions to reduce the research-practice gap. Consistent with public health more broadly, these changes are long overdue in the fields of physical activity and nutrition.

Community and partner engagement in dissemination and implementation research at the National Institutes of Health: an analysis of recently funded studies and opportunities to advance the field

Accelerating and Strengthening Native American Health Research Through a Collaborative NIH Initiative

Community engagement in dissemination and implementation models: A narrative review

Advancing healthcare equity through dissemination and implementation science

Community engagement in research: frameworks for education and peer review

NIH-supported implementation science and nutrition research: a portfolio review of the past decade

Barriers, frameworks, and mitigating strategies influencing the dissemination and implementation of health promotion interventions in indigenous communities: a scoping review

Building Community Engagement Capacity in a Transdisciplinary Population Health Research Consortium

Implementing community-based provider participation in research: an empirical study

Exploring public health researchers' approaches, barriers, and needs regarding dissemination: A mixed-methods exploration

What hinders and helps academics to conduct Dissemination and Implementation (D&I) research in the field of nutrition and physical activity? An international perspective

A funding initiative for community-based participatory research: lessons from the Harvard Catalyst Seed Grants

Sharing of grant funds between academic institutions and community partners in community-based participatory research

Community partner coauthorship for increased implementation science impact: Strengthening capacity and engagement

Researcher and partner perspectives on the relationship between engagement in research and three uses of patient-centered comparative clinical effectiveness research study findings

Enhancing grant-writing expertise in BUILD institutions: Building infrastructure leading to diversity

A Decade of Nutrition and Health Disparities Research at NIH, 2010-2019

Encompassing Cultural Contexts Within Scientific Research Methodologies in the Development of Health Promotion Interventions

Using focused ethnography to inform biomedical research infrastructure enhancement at primarily undergraduate institutions

Are We the Problem? A Call to Action for Addressing Institutional Challenges to Engaging Community Partners in Research

Public perspectives on increased data sharing in health research in the context of the 2023 National Institutes of Health Data Sharing Policy