Abstract:Complex problems require a deep understanding of the issue and a collaborative approach to find sustainable solutions. Cancer disparities are complex and must be understood from a broad set of perspectives across the academic spectrum and non-academic sources (community members, community-based organizations, and policymakers). The Community and Cancer Science Network (CCSN) is a transdisciplinary network focused on addressing statewide cancer disparities. The CCSN grounds its approach in the principles of deep equity, systems-change, and the integration of biology to policy. It brings together diverse perspectives through a three-phase model: 1) Incubate ideas through co-learning among the team members to build shared vocabulary, knowledge, and integrate perspectives on the issue; 2) Innovate by using learnings to develop, prototype and pilot potential solutions; 3) Implement to further scale and embed solutions. Despite challenges, the commitment to this approach enabled our network to expand and strengthen transdisciplinary capacity in its partnerships. Now in its third year, CCSN encompasses four projects using its transdisciplinary approach: 1) a curriculum for biomedical researchers and community members to address mistrust and misunderstandings of disparities; 2) development of a shared measurement system to improve mammographic quality; 3) design and implementation of community-based action plans to address breast and lung cancer disparities, and 4) formation of a workgroup to explore the potential causes and solutions for prostate cancer disparities in the state. The projects are guided and supported through the framework by a leadership structure. To assess the impact of its approach on community-academic partnerships, CCSN assesses against a rubric developed in 2020 with its advisory team. The rubric measures partner perception of impact, values application, belonging, interconnectedness and shared purpose. CCSN looks at quantitative and qualitative data annually to generate insights on the strength of partnerships and how its leadership can build additional capacities. CCSN is currently finalizing its assessment of its third year of data. Initial findings suggest partnerships with sustained relationships and high levels of trust appear to weather challenges that accompany implementation of complex interventions. Results also indicate that partners are eager to consider implications for their own work and to connect with others doing similar work within CCSN as they experience similar challenges including navigating the pace of change. Incorporating varied perspectives into understanding cancer disparities and then developing and implementing solutions requires a thoughtful, deliberate and flexible approach. Our framework provides rigor without rigidity and allows academics and non-academics to build authentic and collaborative relationships which persist through adversity, facilitate a richer understanding of disparities and open doors for future partnerships. Citation Format: Tobi A. Cawthra, Laura Pinsoneault, Alexis Krause, Kristen Gardner-Volle, Kim Kinner, Jenelle Elza, Melinda Stolley. Implementing a transdisciplinary framework to build capacity for complex collaboration among academic and non-academic partners [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 15th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2022 Sep 16-19; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl) nr B078.

A funding initiative for community-based participatory research: lessons from the Harvard Catalyst Seed Grants

Developing and piloting a community scientist academy to engage communities and patients in research

Training Community Members in Public Health Research: Development and Implementation of a Community Participatory Research Pilot Project

Implementing community-based provider participation in research: an empirical study

Sharing of grant funds between academic institutions and community partners in community-based participatory research

Enhancing Capacity of Community–Academic Partnerships to Achieve Health Equity: Results From the CBPR Partnership Academy

Building Community Engagement Capacity in a Transdisciplinary Population Health Research Consortium

Creating a "culture of research" in a community hospital: Strategies and tools from the National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program

The bench to community initiative: community-based participatory research model for translating research discoveries into community solutions

Community-engaged pedagogy: a strengths-based approach to involving diverse stakeholders in research partnerships

Abstract B078: Implementing a transdisciplinary framework to build capacity for complex collaboration among academic and non-academic partners

Engaging the underserved: a process model to mobilize rural community health coalitions as partners in translational research

Community partner coauthorship for increased implementation science impact: Strengthening capacity and engagement

Are We the Problem? A Call to Action for Addressing Institutional Challenges to Engaging Community Partners in Research

Enabling community input to improve equity in and access to translational research: The Community Coalition for Equity in Research

Partnered innovation to implement timely and personalized care: A case study

Lessons Learned from the Implementation of a Shared Community-Academic HIV Prevention Intervention

Going to the Source: Discussions With Early and Mid-Career Faculty From Groups Underrepresented in Biomedical Research to Develop and Enhance CFAR Services

Bronx Community Collaborative Opportunities for Research and Education: Implementation and Evaluation of a Community–Academic Partnership

CASCADE: A Community-Engaged Action Model for Generating Rapid, Patient-Engaged Decisions in Clinical Research

11492 Mapping CTSA hub activities across the EQ-DI framework to discover opportunities for interaction between health equity and dissemination & implementation science; the case of University of Colorado and University of Rochester