Abstract:Introduction: Increasingly aspherical optics are used in contact lens designs to produce a varifocal effect to correct presbyopia. Whilst no current ISO standard describes a method to verify these products, the vertex power needs to be verified by the manufacturer and optometrist. Visionix claim that the VC2001 instrument is able to resolve the vertex power of complex contact lenses and that it has been adopted by contact lens manufacturers as their "gold standard" method of measure. Practitioners rely on the focimeter for contact lens verification and accept that it has poorer resolution. This raises the question of whether practitioners can verify the vertex powers of varifocal contact lenses to a sufficient sensitivity. The purpose of this study is to determine whether a focimeter can differentiate between various vertex powers incorporating differing degrees of asphericity that are used in contact lens designs. Methods: A range of varifocal contact lenses were used with single vision contact lenses as controls. Three types of focimeters were used: a manual focimeter, a projector focimeter and a computerised focimeter (standard and contact lens modes). The VC2001 assessed the vertex powers over the optical zone and was used as a reference for the focimeters. The measures from the VC2001 and the focimeters were analysed by discrepancy analysis. Results: All discrepancy measures fell outside two standard deviations for either the varifocal contact lenses or the single vision contact lenses when the focimeters were compared to the VC2001. This raises the issue of whether the focimeters are measuring the same parameter as the VC2001. Only the analysis of the repeated measurements from the manual focimeter for single vision contact lenses demonstrated an acceptable measure of precision (+/-0.21, 2S.D.) with a very small degree of bias (mean difference -0.024, +/-0.02 [2S.E.]). Conclusion: These results suggest that the manual focimeter can measure the vertex powers for single vision contact lenses to an acceptable degree of precision. The vertex powers of varifocal lenses cannot be verified using standard practice equipment. The VC2001 has poor precision for power measurements and may not be measuring the same parameter as the focimeters and therefore questions the validity of the VC2001 as the "gold standard" for vertex power measurement.

Assessment of the performance of automated focimeters in the measurement of single vision spectacle lenses

Overcoming the Error of Optical Power Measurement Caused by the Curvature Radius.

Overcoming the error of power measurement caused by the curvature radius

Calibration Error on the Measurement of Back Vertex Power for Contact Lenses with Method Using Focimeter with Manual Focusing

Verification of the vertex powers of varifocal rigid contact lenses

Tolerancing and budget in design and production of test lenses for calibration of focimeters

Prescription compliance in ophthalmic lenses

Contour mapping of spectacle lenses

Inter-laboratory reproducibility of power measurement of toric hydrogel lenses using the focimeter and the Moiré deflectometer

Large-aperture automatic focimeter for the measurement of optical power and other optical characteristics of ophthalmic lenses.

Luminance of Projection Focimeter Target with Oblique Viewing

Peripheral Wavefront Sensor with Fixation Target Made by Optical Simulation for Measuring Human Eye Regardless of Spectacle

Refractive power profiles of commercially available soft multifocal contact lenses for myopia control

Evaluation of the Repeatability of the Lenstar and Comparison with Two Other Non-Contact Biometric Devices in Myopes.

Two different autorefractors for vision screening in children and adolescents

Accuracy of Axial Length, Keratometry, and Refractive Measurement with Myopia Master in Children with Ametropia

Visual Quality Indicators with Multifocal and Dual-Focus Soft Contact Lenses for Myopia Control

Intra-Observer and Inter-Observer Variability of Intraocular Lens Measurements Using an Interferometry Metrology Device

Comparison of Refractive Error Measurements between KR-1W Wavefront Analyser and KR-8800 Automatic Refractometer in School children

Comparing ocular biometry and autorefraction measurements from the Myopia Master with the IOLMaster 700 and the Huvitz HRK-8000A autorefractor

Automation and miniaturization of optometry instrument based on the ANSI/ISEA Z87.1 standard