Refractive power profiles of commercially available soft multifocal contact lenses for myopia control

Rebecca M. Dang,Klaus Ehrmann,Isabelle Jalbert,Alex Hui,Pauline Kang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13345
2024-06-01
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
Abstract:Purpose Lens power profiles can provide valuable insights on the imposed optical defocus and visual experience of contact lens wearers, especially in the context of myopia control. This study measured the refractive power profiles of multifocal soft contact lenses (MFCLs) currently used or that have the potential for use in myopia control using high spatial resolution aberrometry. The instrument's repeatability for determining MFCLs power profiles was also assessed. Method The power profiles of 10 MFCLs of various designs (centre‐distance, centre‐near and extended depth of focus) were measured using the Lambda‐X NIMOEVO, a phase shifting Schlieren‐based device. Power profiles were graphically expressed as measured power at each chord position and the maximum add power was calculated. The repeatability of the NIMOEVO was expressed as the within‐subject standard deviation at each chord position for a subset of five MFCLs. Results The measured distance powers differed from nominal powers for more than half of the MFCLs with a definable distance zone. There were variations in the chord position of the distance and near correction zones, rate of power transitions and calculated maximum add between the MFCLs which did not depend on lens design. For half of the MFCLs, the power profile shape was inconsistent between different nominal back vertex powers of the same design. The repeatability of the NIMOEVO was dependent on the lens design, with designs featuring faster rates of power change exhibiting worse repeatability. Conclusions Significant differences in MFCL power profiles were found which were not adequately represented in labelling. This is likely due to the small number of parameters used to define lens power characteristics. Eye health care practitioners should be aware of potential differences in power profiles between different MFCLs, which will impact the retinal defocus introduced during lens wear and the wearer's visual experience.
ophthalmology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?