Abstract:High-resolution synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction (SXPD) data alone are sometimes not enough to solve the structure of a complex polycrystalline material. Such was the case for the high-silica zeolites SSZ-61 and SSZ-87, where combining data from different sources, in particular XPD and electron microscopy, was vital to success. For SSZ-61, the SXPD data feature broad peaks and a resolution of ca. 1.2 Å. Although the pattern could be indexed, structure determination failed both with the charge flipping routine in SUPERFLIP [1] and with the zeolite-specific program FOCUS [2]. The unit cell parameters and HRTEM images indicated a relationship with ZSM-12 (MTW) and SSZ-59 (SFN), so several models derived from these two frameworks were built. Eventually, after considering Si-29 MAS NMR data and the size of the organic structure directing agent (SDA), a framework model that fits all the data emerged. To complete the structure, the SDA was included as a rigid-body, and its location and orientation optimized using simulated annealing. Subsequent Rietveld refinement confirmed the structure. In contrast to SSZ-61, the SXPD pattern for SSZ-87 was quite good, and it could be indexed with a C-centered cell. However, structure solution failed, probably because of the very high degree of reflection overlap (93%). Therefore, rotation electron diffraction (RED) data [3] were collected, but they proved to be of low resolution and poor quality. Only 2 of the 7 data sets could be indexed, and these had different unit cells. Neither fit the XPD pattern directly. The problem was traced to large errors in the RED cell parameters, and eventually one RED cell could be transformed to one similar to the SXPD cell. The RED data with this cell was only 15% complete up to a resolution of 1.22 Å. Even so, the structure could be solved using a recently developed version of FOCUS that works with ED data. The SDA was found as for SSZ-61, and the structure then confirmed by Rietveld refinement.

Case Studies of Using the Partial-Structure R1 and the Single-Atom R1 to Assemble Small-Molecule Crystal Structures

Using Partial Structure R1 to Determine Small-Molecule Crystal Structures at the Lowest Resolution Limits

The Single-Atom R1: a new optimization method to solve crystal structures

Introducing the Single-Atom Real-Space Global Minimization Method for Solving Small Structures in Single Crystal X-ray Crystallography

Solving protein structures by combining structure prediction, molecular replacement and direct-methods-aided model completion

The Deconstruction of Supramolecular Structures Based on Modular Precise Macromolecules

Unraveling Low-Resolution Structural Data Of Large Biomolecules By Constructing Atomic Models With Experiment-Targeted Parallel Cascade Selection Simulations

Protein Structure Determination Using a Riemannian Approach

Scaled Alternating Steepest Descent Algorithm Applied for Protein Structure Determination from Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Data.

Recent Developments in the Refinement and Analysis of Crystal Structures

Rationalizing polymorphism with local correlation-based methods: A case study of pnictogen molecular crystals

Circumventing a challenging aspect of crystal structure determination from powder diffraction data

A Local-Optimization Refinement Algorithm in Single Particle Analysis for Macromolecular Complex with Multiple Rigid Modules

Accurate structure models and absolute configuration determination using dynamical effects in continuous-rotation 3D electron diffraction data

MD-assisted Refinement of X-Ray Coordinates

Structure Determination of Nanocrystals

How Accurate Can Crystal Structure Predictions Be for High-Energy Molecular Crystals?

New Tricks of the Trade for Crystal Structure Refinement

When Two Bad Data Sets Are Better Than One

Hydrogen-bonded frameworks for molecular structure determination

Coordinate‐based simulation of pair distance distribution functions for small and large molecular assemblies: implementation and applications