A neo-Kantian explanation of the applicability of mathematics to physics

Jorge Manero

2024-08-06

Abstract:Various 'optimistic' attempts have been made to reasonably explain the undeniable effectiveness of mathematics in its application to physics. They range over retrospective, historical accounts of mathematical applicability based on pragmatic considerations, on the one side, and prospective accounts based on indispensability considerations, on the other. In view of some objections that I will raise against these accounts, I would like to propose a third alternative based on Ernst Cassirer's neo-Kantian view which can overcome these objections and embrace both pragmatic and indispensability considerations. According to this view, mathematics and physics are seen as different modes of a basic process of cognitive synthesis that are essentially applied to each other according to a priori principles of theory development inherently incorporated into scientists' minds. As emphasised by Cassirer, these principles have a constitutive role (i.e., they explain the relevant phenomena across scientific change) and a regulative role (i.e., they incorporate the ideal of unity, permanence and generality at each stage of knowledge), both of which have been captured through a functional (i.e., structural) understanding of concepts. As a particular case study, these principles shall be instantiated by invariance groups responsible for the effectiveness of applying Lie group theory to physics.

History and Philosophy of Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is the effective application of mathematics in physics. Specifically, the author explores why mathematics can be applied to physical sciences so effectively and tries to provide a new explanatory framework to understand this effectiveness. The following is a more detailed interpretation:

### 1. Research Background

Historically, many scholars have attempted to explain the effective application of mathematics in physics. These explanations can be roughly divided into two categories:
- **Retrospective Explanation**: Based on pragmatism, it reviews from a historical perspective how mathematics has been applied to physics.
- **Prospective Explanation**: Based on indispensability, it explores the necessity of mathematics for physics from the perspective of future development.

However, both of these explanations have some limitations:
- The retrospective explanation fails to fully focus on the compositional dimension of mathematical knowledge.
- The prospective explanation ignores the roles of pragmatism and normativity.

### 2. The New View Proposed

The author proposes a third explanation based on Ernst Cassirer's neo - Kantian view. According to this view, mathematics and physics are regarded as different modes of the basic process of cognitive synthesis, and they interact according to the a priori principles of theoretical development inherent in the scientist's mind.

### 3. The Neo - Kantian Framework

The neo - Kantian framework emphasizes the following points:
- **Constitutive Principle**: Explain relevant phenomena and ensure their consistency in scientific change.
- **Normative Principle**: Incorporate the ideals of unity, permanence, and universality at each stage of knowledge.

Specifically, Cassirer believes that these principles are achieved by structuring the concept of understanding. For example, invariance groups play a crucial role in the application of Lie group theory, which illustrates the effectiveness of mathematics in physics.

### 4. Methodological Plan

The methodological plan of the paper is as follows:
- **Section 2**: Briefly outline the problem of the application of mathematics in physics.
- **Section 3**: Introduce the neo - Kantian framework of mathematical applicability, including Kant's epistemology and Cassirer's neo - Kantianism.
- **Section 4**: Apply the new framework to the field of Lie group theory to show its relevance.
- **Section 5**: Summarize the full text.

### 5. Key Problems and Solutions

The author points out that traditional optimistic explanations (whether retrospective or prospective) have some problems:
- **Retrospective Pragmatism View**: It relies too much on specific historical cases and lacks a systematic explanation.
- **Prospective View**: Such as Neoplatonism or "Pythagorean" structuralism, it is divorced from actual practice and cannot establish the special situation of mathematics in science.

To solve these problems, the author proposes a new framework that combines pragmatism and indispensability considerations. The key to this framework is to abandon the binary opposition between form and content and emphasize that mathematics and physics are different aspects of the cognitive synthesis process.

### 6. Conclusion

By introducing the neo - Kantian view, the author attempts to provide a more comprehensive and profound explanation to reveal the a priori conditions behind the effective application of mathematics in physics. This not only solves the limitations of traditional explanations but also provides a new perspective for future scientific research.

Hope this summary can help you understand the core problems of the paper and the solutions proposed by the author. If you have more questions or need further details, please feel free to let me know!