Geometry as an object of experience: Kant and the missed debate between Poincaré and Einstein

S. Hacyan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0712.2222

2007-12-13

History and Philosophy of Physics

Abstract:Poincar\'e held the view that geometry is a convention and cannot be tested experimentally. This position was apparently refuted by the general theory of relativity and the successful confirmation of its predictions; unfortunately, Poincar\'e did not live to defend his thesis. In this paper, I argue that: 1) Contrary to what many authors have claimed, non-euclidean geometries do not rule out Kant's thesis that space is a form of intuition given {\it a priori}; on the contrary, Euclidean geometry is the condition for the possibility of any more general geometry. 2) The conception of space-time as a Riemannian manifold is an extremely ingenious way to describe the gravitational field, but, as shown by Utiyama in 1956, general relativity is actually the gauge theory associated to the Lorentz group. Utiyama's approach does not rely on the assumption that space-time is curved, though the equations of the gauge theory are identical to those of general relativity. Thus, following Poincar\'e, it can be claimed that it is only a matter of convention to describe the gravitational field as a Riemannian manifold or as a gauge field in Euclidean space.