Abstract:Quantum Annealing (QA) relies on mixing two Hamiltonian terms, a simple driver and a complex problem Hamiltonian, in a linear combination. The time-dependent schedule for this mixing is often taken to be linear in time: improving on this linear choice is known to be essential and has proven to be difficult. Here, we present different techniques for improving on the linear-schedule QA along two directions, conceptually distinct but leading to similar outcomes: 1) the first approach consists of constructing a Trotter-digitized QA (dQA) with schedules parameterized in terms of Fourier modes or Chebyshev polynomials, inspired by the Chopped Random Basis algorithm (CRAB) for optimal control in continuous time; 2) the second approach is technically a Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), whose solutions are found iteratively using linear interpolation or expansion in Fourier modes. Both approaches emphasize finding smooth optimal schedule parameters, ultimately leading to hybrid quantum-classical variational algorithms of the alternating Hamiltonian Ansatz type. We apply these techniques to MaxCut problems on weighted 3-regular graphs with N = 14 sites, focusing on hard instances that exhibit a small spectral gap, for which a standard linear-schedule QA performs poorly. We characterize the physics behind the optimal protocols for both the dQA and QAOA approaches, discovering shortcuts to adiabaticity-like dynamics. Furthermore, we study the transferability of such smooth solutions among hard instances of MaxCut at different circuit depths. Finally, we show that the smoothness pattern of these protocols obtained in a digital setting enables us to adapt them to continuous-time evolution, contrarily to generic non-smooth solutions. This procedure results in an optimized quantum annealing schedule that is implementable on analog devices.

Benchmarking a heuristic Floquet adiabatic algorithm for the Max-Cut problem

Imaginary Hamiltonian variational ansatz for combinatorial optimization problems

Circumventing superexponential runtimes for hard instances of quantum adiabatic optimization

Benchmarking Adiabatic Quantum Optimization for Complex Network Analysis

A benchmarking study of quantum algorithms for combinatorial optimization

Quantum Optimization for the Maximum Cut Problem on a Superconducting Quantum Computer

Unstructured Adiabatic Quantum Optimization: Optimality with Limitations

Performance of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm on the Maximum Cut Problem

Classical optimization with imaginary time block encoding on quantum computers: The MaxCut problem

Benchmarking Variational Quantum Algorithms for Combinatorial Optimization in Practice

Quantum combinatorial optimization beyond the variational paradigm: simple schedules for hard problems

Hybrid Quantum-Classical Multilevel Approach for Maximum Cuts on Graphs

Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithms for Maxmimum Cut on Low-Girth Graphs

Max-flow min-cut theorem in quantum computing

Benchmarking digital quantum simulations above hundreds of qubits using quantum critical dynamics

Simulating adiabatic quantum computing with parameterized quantum circuits

Sampling Frequency Thresholds for Quantum Advantage of Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm

Practicality of quantum adiabatic algorithm for chemistry applications

Beyond Quantum Annealing: Optimal control solutions to MaxCut problems

Performance of quantum annealing inspired algorithms for combinatorial optimization problems

Adiabatic quantum computing with parameterized quantum circuits