A benchmarking study of quantum algorithms for combinatorial optimization

Krishanu Sankar,Artur Scherer,Satoshi Kako,Sam Reifenstein,Navid Ghadermarzy,Willem B. Krayenhoff,Yoshitaka Inui,Edwin Ng,Tatsuhiro Onodera,Pooya Ronagh,Yoshihisa Yamamoto
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-024-00856-3
IF: 10.758
2024-06-23
npj Quantum Information
Abstract:We study the performance scaling of three quantum algorithms for combinatorial optimization: measurement-feedback coherent Ising machines (MFB-CIM), discrete adiabatic quantum computation (DAQC), and the Dürr–Høyer algorithm for quantum minimum finding (DH-QMF) that is based on Grover's search. We use M ax C ut problems as a reference for comparison, and time-to-solution (TTS) as a practical measure of performance for these optimization algorithms. For each algorithm, we analyze its performance in solving two types of M ax C ut problems: weighted graph instances with randomly generated edge weights attaining 21 equidistant values from −1 to 1; and randomly generated Sherrington–Kirkpatrick (SK) spin glass instances. We empirically find a significant performance advantage for the studied MFB-CIM in comparison to the other two algorithms. We empirically observe a sub-exponential scaling for the median TTS for the MFB-CIM, in comparison to the almost exponential scaling for DAQC and the proven scaling for DH-QMF. We conclude that the MFB-CIM outperforms DAQC and DH-QMF in solving M ax C ut problems.
physics, condensed matter, applied, atomic, molecular & chemical,quantum science & technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?