Abstract:The real-time simulation of large many-body quantum systems is a formidable task, that may only be achievable with a genuine quantum computational platform. Currently, quantum hardware with a number of qubits sufficient to make classical emulation challenging is available. This condition is necessary for the pursuit of a so-called quantum advantage, but it also makes verifying the results very difficult. In this manuscript, we flip the perspective and utilize known theoretical results about many-body quantum critical dynamics to benchmark quantum hardware and various error mitigation techniques on up to 133 qubits. In particular, we benchmark against known universal scaling laws in the Hamiltonian simulation of a time-dependent transverse field Ising Hamiltonian. Incorporating only basic error mitigation and suppression methods, our study shows reliable control up to a two-qubit gate depth of 28, featuring a maximum of 1396 two-qubit gates, before noise becomes prevalent. These results are transferable to applications such as Hamiltonian simulation, variational algorithms, optimization, or quantum machine learning. We demonstrate this on the example of digitized quantum annealing for optimization and identify an optimal working point in terms of both circuit depth and time step on a 133-site optimization problem.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is the challenge of real - time simulation of large - scale many - body quantum systems, especially the dynamic behavior near the quantum critical point. Specifically, the researchers use the known theoretical results of many - body quantum critical dynamics to benchmark the performance of quantum hardware and its various error - mitigation techniques on up to 133 qubits. Through this method, they hope to evaluate the reliability and accuracy of current quantum computing platforms when performing complex quantum simulation tasks, especially for the simulation of time - dependent transverse - field Ising Hamiltonians. In addition, the study also explores how these results can be applied to other fields, such as Hamiltonian simulation, variational algorithms, optimization, or quantum machine learning, etc. ### Main contributions of the paper 1. **Benchmarking method**: - Proposed an application - oriented benchmarking method based on known universal scaling laws to evaluate the quality of large - scale quantum simulations. - By simulating quantum critical dynamics and measuring observables consistent with known universal scaling laws, determine the number of circuit layers that can be reliably simulated. 2. **Experimental verification**: - Conducted experiments on two quantum processors (ibmtorino and ibmsherbrooke), with 133 and 127 qubits respectively. - Compared the effects of different error - mitigation and suppression techniques, showing how these techniques affect the reliability of the simulation. 3. **Application expansion**: - Applied the benchmarking results to combinatorial optimization problems, especially through digital quantum annealing (QA) and quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA). - Identified the optimal operating points regarding time steps and circuit layers under limited hardware resources to minimize the residual energy. ### Key formulas - **Universal scaling law of density defects**: \[ n_{\text{def}} \propto t_f^{-\frac{d\nu}{1+z\nu}} \] where \( d \) is the system dimension, and \( \nu \) and \( z \) are critical exponents. For a one - dimensional system (\( d = 1 \), \( z = 1 \), \( \nu = 1 \)), the formula simplifies to: \[ n_{\text{def}} \propto t_f^{-\frac{1}{2}} \] - **Defect density under Landau - Zener theory**: \[ n_{\text{def}} \propto p_{\text{LZ}} \approx \exp\left(-\frac{b t_f}{N^2}\right) \] where \( b \) is a constant. - **Defect density under adiabatically slow annealing**: \[ n_{\text{def}} \approx p_{\text{LZ}}(t_f)+\left(1 - 2p_{\text{LZ}}(t_f)\right) \frac{a}{t_f^2} \] where \( a \) is a constant depending on the derivative of the annealing schedule. ### Conclusion This paper successfully evaluated the performance of current quantum computing platforms in performing large - scale many - body quantum system simulation tasks through an application - oriented benchmarking method. The study not only provides an in - depth understanding of quantum hardware and error - mitigation techniques but also shows the potential of these techniques in practical applications, especially in fields such as optimization and quantum machine learning.

Benchmarking digital quantum simulations above hundreds of qubits using quantum critical dynamics

Benchmarking simulated and physical quantum processing units using quantum and hybrid algorithms

Variational Quantum Simulation of Chemical Dynamics with Quantum Computers

Benchmarking bosonic and fermionic dynamics

Massively Parallel Quantum Computer Simulator, Eleven Years Later.

Benchmarking Quantum Computer Simulation Software Packages: State Vector Simulators

A Comprehensive Cross-Model Framework for Benchmarking the Performance of Quantum Hamiltonian Simulations

Benchmarking an 11-qubit quantum computer

Quantum Benchmarking via Random Dynamical Quantum Maps

Optimized Quantum Simulation Algorithms for Scalar Quantum Field Theories

Ab-initio tree-tensor-network digital twin for quantum computer benchmarking in 2D

Queen: A quick, scalable, and comprehensive quantum circuit simulation for supercomputing

Long-Time Error-Mitigating Simulation of Open Quantum Systems on Near Term Quantum Computers

Probing critical states of matter on a digital quantum computer

Benchmarking Quantum Processor Performance at Scale

Benchmarking Quantum Simulators using Ergodic Quantum Dynamics

Quantum many-body simulations on digital quantum computers: State-of-the-art and future challenges

Noisy intermediate scale quantum simulation of time dependent Hamiltonians

Quantum Chemistry as a Benchmark for Near-Term Quantum Computers

Distributed Simulation of Statevectors and Density Matrices