Comparative analysis of the SFR of AGN and non-AGN galaxies, as a function of stellar mass, AGN power, cosmic time and obscuration

G. Mountrichas,V. A. Masoura,A. Corral,F. J. Carrera
2024-01-17
Abstract:This study involves a comparative analysis of the SFRs of AGN and non-AGN galaxies and of the SFRs of type 1 and 2 AGN. To carry out this investigation, we assembled a dataset consisting of 2\,677 X-ray AGN detected by the XMM-Newton observatory and a control sample of 64\,556 galaxies devoid of AGN. We generated SEDs for these objects using photometric data from the DES, VHS, and AllWISE surveys, and we harnessed the CIGALE code to extract measurements for the (host) galaxy properties. Our dataset encompasses sources spanning a range from $\rm 9.5<\log\,[M_*(M_\odot)]<12.0$, $\rm 42<\log\,[L_{X,2-10keV}(ergs^{-1})]<45.5$, and $\rm 0.3<z<2.5$. To compare SFRs, we calculated the SFR$_{norm}$ parameter. Our analysis revealed that AGN tend to exhibit elevated SFRs compared to non-AGN galaxies, particularly beyond a certain threshold in L$_X$. Notably, this threshold increases as we move towards more massive galaxies. Additionally, for AGN systems with the same L$_X$, the magnitude of the SFR$_{norm}$ decreases as we consider more massive galaxies. This suggests that in galaxies with AGN, the increase in SFR as a function of M$_*$ is not as prominent as in galaxies without AGN. This interpretation finds support in the shallower slope we identify in the X-ray star-forming MS in contrast to the galaxy MS. Employing CIGALE's measurements, we classified AGN into type 1 and type 2. In our investigation, we focused on a subset of 652 type 1 AGN and 293 type 2 AGN with $\rm 10.5<\log,[M_(M_\odot)]<11.5$. Based on our results, type 1 AGN display higher SFRs than type 2 AGN, at redshifts below $\rm z<1$. However, at higher redshifts, the SFRs of the two AGN populations tend to be similar. At redshifts $\rm z<1$, type 1 AGN show augmented SFRs in comparison to non-AGN galaxies. In contrast, type 2 AGN exhibit lower SFRs when compared to galaxies that do not host an AGN.
Astrophysics of Galaxies
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the paper attempts to solve This paper aims to conduct a comparative analysis of the star formation rates (SFRs) of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) and non - AGN galaxies, and explore the SFR differences of these galaxies under different stellar masses, AGN powers, cosmic times and obscuration levels. Specifically, the researchers attempt to answer the following key questions: 1. **SFR differences between AGN and non - AGN galaxies**: - Is the SFR of AGN galaxies significantly higher than that of non - AGN galaxies? - Does this difference change with the variation of stellar mass and redshift? 2. **SFR differences among different types of AGNs**: - Are there significant differences in the SFRs between Type 1 AGNs and Type 2 AGNs? - Is this difference affected by the AGN power (L_X) and redshift? 3. **The relationship between SFR and AGN power**: - Is there a correlation between the AGN power (L_X) and SFR? - Does this correlation perform consistently within different stellar mass and redshift ranges? 4. **The influence of obscuration on AGN SFR**: - Is the SFR of obscured AGNs (Type 2 AGNs) lower than that of unobscured AGNs (Type 1 AGNs)? - Does the influence of obscuration on SFR change with the variation of redshift and AGN power? ### Research methods To answer the above questions, the researchers adopted the following methods: - **Dataset construction**: Use 2,677 X - ray AGNs detected by the XMM - Newton observatory and a control sample containing 64,556 non - AGN galaxies. - **Spectral energy distribution (SED) generation**: Generate SEDs using the photometric data from the DES, VHS and AllWISE surveys, and extract galaxy properties using the CIGALE code. - **SFR norm parameter calculation**: Define the SFR norm parameter as the ratio of the SFR of AGN galaxies to that of non - AGN galaxies with similar stellar masses and redshifts. - **Type classification**: Classify AGNs into Type 1 and Type 2 using the measurement results of CIGALE. ### Main findings - **SFR differences between AGN and non - AGN galaxies**: - The SFR of AGN galaxies is generally higher than that of non - AGN galaxies, especially when L_X exceeds a certain threshold. - This threshold increases with the increase of stellar mass. - For AGN systems with the same L_X, the SFR norm decreases with the increase of stellar mass. - **SFR differences among different types of AGNs**: - At redshift z < 1, the SFR of Type 1 AGNs is higher than that of Type 2 AGNs. - At higher redshifts (z > 2) and high L_X, the SFRs of the two types of AGNs tend to be similar. - At z < 1, the SFR of Type 1 AGNs is higher than that of non - AGN galaxies, while the SFR of Type 2 AGNs is lower than that of non - AGN galaxies. - **The relationship between SFR and AGN power**: - There is a positive correlation between the AGN power (L_X) and SFR, but this relationship performs inconsistently within different stellar mass and redshift ranges. - At low - to - medium L_X, the SFR of AGN galaxies is enhanced, while at high L_X, this enhancement trend weakens. - **The influence of obscuration on AGN SFR**: - The SFR of obscured AGNs (Type 2 AGNs) is generally lower than that of unobscured AGNs (Type 1 AGNs), especially at z < 1. - As the redshift increases, this difference gradually decreases. Through these analyses, the researchers hope to better understand the relationship between AGN activities and galaxy evolution, as well as the influence of the obscuration mechanism on SFR.