The properties of supermassive black holes and their host galaxies for type 1 and 2 AGN in the eFEDS and COSMOS fields

G. Mountrichas,I. Georgantopoulos

2023-12-19

Abstract:In this study, our primary objective is to compare the properties of SMBH and their host galaxies between type 1 and type 2 AGN. In our analysis, we use X-ray detected sources in two fields, namely the eFEDS and the COSMOS-Legacy. To classify the X-ray sources, we perform SED fitting analysis, using the CIGALE code. Ensuring the robustness of our analysis is paramount, and to achieve this, we impose stringent selection criteria. Thus, only sources with extensive photometric data across the optical, near- and mid-infrared part of the spectrum and reliable host galaxy properties and classifications were included. The final sample consists of 3,312 AGN, of which 3\,049 are classified as type 1 and 263 as type 2. The sources span a redshift range of $\rm 0.5<z<3.5$ and encompass a wide range of L$_X$, falling within $\rm 42<log,[L_{X,2-10keV}(ergs^{-1})]<46$. Our results show that type 2 AGN exhibit a tendency to inhabit more massive galaxies, by $0.2-0.3$\,dex, compared to type 1 sources. Type 2 AGN also display, on average, lower specific black hole accretion rates, a proxy of the Eddington ratio, compared to type 1 AGN. These differences persist across all redshifts and L$_X$ considered within our dataset. Moreover, our analysis uncovers, that type 2 sources tend to have lower star-formation rates compared to 1 AGN, at $\rm z<1$. This picture reverses at $\rm z>2$ and $\rm log,[L_{X,2-10keV}(ergs^{-1})]>44$. Similar patterns emerge when we categorize AGN based on their X-ray obscuration levels ($N_H$). However, in this case, the observed differences are pronounced only for low-to-intermediate L$_X$ AGN and are also sensitive to the $\rm N_H$ threshold applied for the AGN classification. These comprehensive findings enhance our understanding of the intricate relationships governing AGN types and their host galaxy properties across diverse cosmic epochs and luminosity regimes.

Astrophysics of Galaxies

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to compare the property differences between the galaxies hosting two types in active galactic nuclei (AGN), namely type 1 and type 2 AGN, and their super - massive black holes (SMBH). Specifically, the research aims to explore the following points by analyzing X - ray sources in the eFEDS and COSMOS fields, using the spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting method:

1. **Differences in the mass of the host galaxies**: The study found that type 2 AGN tend to reside in more massive galaxies, approximately 0.2 to 0.3 dex (on a logarithmic scale) higher than type 1 AGN.

2. **Differences in the star formation rate (SFR)**: In the range of redshift \(z < 1\), the star formation rate of type 2 AGN is generally lower than that of type 1 AGN. However, under the conditions of \(z > 2\) and \(\log [L_X, 2 - 10 \text{keV} (\text{ergs}^{-1})]>44\), this trend is reversed, and the star formation rate of type 2 AGN is higher than that of type 1 AGN.

3. **Differences in the specific black hole accretion rate (\(\lambda\)sBHAR)**: The specific black hole accretion rate (\(\lambda\)sBHAR) of type 2 AGN, as a proxy for the Eddington ratio, is generally lower than that of type 1 AGN. These differences exist across all redshifts and X - ray luminosity ranges covered by the research data set.

### Research methods
To achieve the above goals, the researchers adopted the following methods:

- **Data sources**: Used X - ray source data in the eFEDS and COSMOS - Legacy fields.
- **Classification method**: Classified X - ray sources as type 1 or type 2 AGN through SED fitting analysis, especially by using the CIGALE code to measure the inclination angle.
- **Selection criteria**: Only selected sources with extensive luminosity data and reliable host galaxy properties for analysis to ensure the robustness of the results.
- **Statistical analysis**: Compared the distributions of star formation rates, host galaxy masses, and specific black hole accretion rates of different types of AGN through statistical methods such as the Kolmogorov - Smirnov (KS) test.

### Main conclusions
- **Host galaxy mass**: The mass of the galaxies hosting type 2 AGN is generally higher than that of type 1 AGN.
- **Star formation rate**: In the low - redshift range, the star formation rate of type 2 AGN is lower; but in the high - redshift and high - X - ray luminosity range, the star formation rate of type 2 AGN is higher.
- **Specific black hole accretion rate**: The specific black hole accretion rate of type 2 AGN is generally lower than that of type 1 AGN.

These findings are helpful for understanding the complex relationships between different types of AGN and the properties of their host galaxies, and provide new insights into the evolution stages of AGN.