The properties of supermassive black holes and their host galaxies for type 1 and 2 active galactic nuclei in the eFEDS and COSMOS fields

G. Mountrichas,I. Georgantopoulos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348156

2024-01-10

Abstract:In this study, our primary objective is to compare the properties of supermassive black holes (SMBHs) and their host galaxies between type 1 and type 2 active galactic nuclei (AGNs). In our analysis, we use X-ray detected sources in two fields, namely the eFEDS and the COSMOS-Legacy . To classify the X-ray sources, we performed a spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting analysis, using the CIGALE code. The robustness of our analysis was paramount so, to ensure this, we imposed stringent selection criteria. Thus, only sources with extensive photometric data across the optical, near- and mid-infrared part of the spectrum and reliable host galaxy properties and classifications were included. The final sample consists of 3,312 AGNs, of which 3\,049 are classified as type 1 and 263 as type 2. The sources span a redshift range of $ 0.5<z<3.5$ and encompass a wide range of X-ray luminosities, falling within $ L_ X,2-10keV (ergs^ <46$. Our results show that type 2 AGNs exhibit a tendency to inhabit more massive galaxies, by $0.2-0.3$\,dex (on a logarithmic scale), compared to type 1 sources. Type 2 AGNs also display, on average, lower specific black hole accretion rates, a proxy of the Eddington ratio, compared to type 1 AGNs. These differences persist across all redshifts and L$_X$ considered within our dataset. Moreover, our analysis uncovers that type 2 sources tend to have lower star formation rates compared to type 1 AGNs at $ z 2$ and $ L_ X,2-10keV (ergs^ >44$. Similar patterns emerge when we categorize AGNs based on their X-ray obscuration levels ($N_H$). However, in this case, the observed differences are pronounced only for low-to-intermediate L$_X$ AGNs and are also sensitive to the $ N_H$ threshold applied for the AGN classification. These comprehensive findings enhance our understanding of the intricate relationships governing AGN types and their host galaxy properties across diverse cosmic epochs and luminosity regimes.

astronomy & astrophysics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to compare the property differences of super - massive black holes (SMBHs) and their host galaxies in two types of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) - Type I and Type II AGNs. Specifically, the research aims to compare the host galaxy properties of these two types of AGNs, such as star formation rate (SFR), stellar mass ($M^*$), and specific black - hole accretion rate ($\lambda_{\text{sBHAR}}$), etc., by analyzing the X - ray sources detected in the eFEDS and COSMOS fields. The research also explores whether these differences change with redshift ($z$) and X - ray luminosity ($L_X$).

### Research Background
Active galactic nuclei (AGNs) play a crucial role in the evolution of galaxies. Their energy comes from the accretion of matter onto super - massive black holes (SMBHs) located at the centers of galaxies. The co - evolution of AGNs and their host galaxies is regulated by multiple mechanisms, including the accretion process of SMBHs and the feedback effects of AGNs. In order to reveal this complex interaction, it is very important to understand the internal structure of AGNs, especially to distinguish the physical differences between obscured and unobscured AGNs.

### Main Findings
- **Stellar Mass**: Type II AGNs tend to exist in galaxies that are heavier than those of Type I AGNs, with a mass difference of about 0.2 - 0.3 dex (on a logarithmic scale).
- **Specific Black - Hole Accretion Rate**: The specific black - hole accretion rate ($\lambda_{\text{sBHAR}}$) of Type II AGNs, as a proxy for the Eddington ratio, is generally lower than that of Type I AGNs.
- **Star Formation Rate**: In the case of redshift $z < 1$, the star formation rate (SFR) of Type II AGNs is generally lower than that of Type I AGNs; however, in the case of $z > 2$ and $\log [L_X, 2 - 10 \text{ keV} (\text{erg s}^{-1})] > 44$, this trend is reversed.
- **X - ray Obscuration Level**: When classifying AGNs according to the X - ray obscuration level ($N_H$), the above - mentioned differences are particularly evident in AGNs with low to medium X - ray luminosities and are sensitive to the choice of $N_H$ threshold.

### Methods
- **Data Sources**: Used the X - ray sources detected in the eFEDS and COSMOS fields.
- **Classification Method**: Performed spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting analysis through the CIGALE code and measured the inclination parameter ($i$) to classify AGNs.
- **Selection Criteria**: Only selected sources with extensive luminosity data and reliable host galaxy properties. The final sample includes 3,312 AGNs, of which 3,049 are classified as Type I and 263 as Type II.

### Conclusions
This research enhances our understanding of the complex relationships between different types of AGNs and the properties of their host galaxies, especially in different cosmic epochs and luminosity ranges. These findings support the diversity of AGN types and the close connection between their host galaxy properties.