A comparative analysis of the active galactic nucleus and star formation characteristics of broad and narrow line Seyfert 1 galaxies

Kshama S. Kurian,C. S. Stalin,S. Rakshit,G. Mountrichas,D. Wylezalek,R. Sagar,M. Kissler-Patig

2024-06-17

Abstract:We report here our comparative analysis of active galactic nucleus (AGN) and star formation (SF) characteristics of a sample of narrow-line Seyfert 1 (NLS1) and broad-line Seyfert 1 (BLS1) galaxies. Our sample consisted of 373 BLS1 and 240 NLS1 galaxies spanning the redshift 0.02 to 0.8. The broad-band spectral energy distribution, constructed using data from the ultra-violet to the far-infrared, was modelled using CIGALE to derive the basic properties of our sample. We searched for differences in stellar mass, star formation rate (SFR), and AGN luminosity in the two populations. We also estimated new radiation-pressure corrected black hole masses for our sample of BLS1 and NLS1 galaxies. While the virial black hole mass (MBH) of BLS1 galaxies is similar to their radiation-pressure corrected MBH values, the virial MBH values of NLS1 galaxies are underestimated. We found that NLS1 galaxies have a lower MBH of log (MBH) = 7.45 +/- 0.27 and a higher log (Eddington ratio) of -0.72 +/- 0.22 than BLS1 galaxies, which have log (MBH) and log (Eddington ratio) of 8.04 +/- 0.26 and -1.08 +/- 0.24, respectively. The distributions of stellar mass, SFR, and specific star formation (sSFR = SFR/stellar mass) for the two populations are indistinguishable. This analysis is based on an independent approach and contradicts reports in the literature that NLS1 galaxies have a higher SF than BLS1 galaxies. While we found that AGN luminosity increases with stellar mass, luminosity of SF flattens at high stellar mass for both BLS1 and NLS1 galaxies. The reason may be that SF is suppressed by AGN feedback at stellar mass higher than 10^11 solar mass or that the AGN fuelling mechanism is decoupled from SF. Separating the sample into radio-detected and radio-undetected subsamples, we found no difference in their SF properties suggesting that the effect of AGN jets on SF is negligible.

Astrophysics of Galaxies

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the paper attempts to solve

This paper aims to explore the differences in the properties of active galactic nuclei (AGN) and star formation (SF) between narrow - line Seyfert 1 galaxies (NLS1) and broad - line Seyfert 1 galaxies (BLS1). Specifically, the researchers hope to answer the following key questions:

1. **Differences in black hole mass**: Is the central black hole mass in NLS1 galaxies lower than that in BLS1 galaxies?
2. **Differences in Eddington ratio**: Is the Eddington ratio in NLS1 galaxies higher than that in BLS1 galaxies?
3. **Differences in star formation rate**: Is the star formation rate in NLS1 galaxies higher than that in BLS1 galaxies?
4. **Differences in host galaxy properties**: Are there significant differences in stellar mass, star formation rate and specific star formation rate (sSFR) between the host galaxies of NLS1 and BLS1 galaxies?

### Research background

NLS1 galaxies are a special type of active galactic nuclei. Since they were identified by Osterbrock and Pogge in 1985, they have received extensive attention due to their unique properties. These galaxies have narrow optical emission lines, high Fe II line intensities, steep soft X - ray spectra and rapid X - ray variations. These observational features are thought to be caused by low - mass black holes (with mass ranges from \(10^6\) to \(10^8\) solar masses) at very high accretion rates.

However, research on the black hole mass and star formation rate in NLS1 galaxies is controversial. Some studies show that the black hole mass in NLS1 galaxies is lower, but other studies have found that their black hole mass is similar to that of BLS1 galaxies. In addition, there are also different views on whether the star formation rate in NLS1 galaxies is higher than that in BLS1 galaxies.

### Research methods

In order to systematically compare the AGN and star formation characteristics of NLS1 and BLS1 galaxies, the researchers adopted the following methods:

1. **Sample selection**: 373 BLS1 galaxies and 240 NLS1 galaxies were selected, with a redshift range from 0.02 to 0.8.
2. **Multi - band spectral energy distribution (SED) modeling**: The CIGALE code was used to model broadband data from ultraviolet to far - infrared to derive the basic properties of the samples, including stellar mass (\(M_*\)), star formation rate (SFR) and AGN luminosity (\(L_{\text{AGN}}\)).
3. **Radiation - pressure - corrected black hole mass estimation**: A new radiation - pressure - corrected black hole mass estimation was carried out for the samples of BLS1 and NLS1 galaxies.

### Main findings

1. **Black hole mass**: The black hole mass in NLS1 galaxies is lower, with a logarithmic mass of \( \log (M_{\text{BH}} [M_\odot]) = 7.45 \pm 0.27 \), while the black hole mass in BLS1 galaxies is higher, with a logarithmic mass of \( \log (M_{\text{BH}} [M_\odot]) = 8.04 \pm 0.26 \).
2. **Eddington ratio**: The Eddington ratio in NLS1 galaxies is higher, with a logarithmic ratio of \( \log (\lambda_{\text{Edd}}) = - 0.72 \pm 0.22 \), while the Eddington ratio in BLS1 galaxies is lower, with a logarithmic ratio of \( \log (\lambda_{\text{Edd}}) = - 1.08 \pm 0.24 \).
3. **Star formation rate**: The distributions of star formation rate and specific star formation rate (sSFR) in NLS1 and BLS1 galaxies are similar, with no significant differences.
4. **Relationship between AGN luminosity and stellar mass**: AGN luminosity increases with stellar mass, but at high stellar mass (\( \sim 10^{11} M_\odot \)), the star formation rate tends to level off, which may be due to AGN feedback suppressing star formation or the AGN energy - supply mechanism decoupling from star formation.

### Conclusions

This study analyzed the AGN and star formation characteristics of NLS1 and BLS1 galaxies by independent methods and obtained results that are contradictory to some reports in the literature. Specifically, the star formation rate in NLS1 galaxies is not higher than that in BLS1 galaxies, and there are no significant differences between the two in terms of stellar mass and specific star formation rate. These findings are helpful for a better understanding of NLS1 and BLS1.