Abstract:Problem definition: Firms heavily invest in big data technologies to collect consumer data and infer consumer preferences for price discrimination. However, consumers can use technological devices to manipulate their data and fool firms to obtain better deals. We examine how a firm invests in collecting consumer data and makes pricing decisions and whether it should disclose its scope of data collection to consumers who can manipulate their data. Methodology/results: We develop a game-theoretic model to consider a market in which a firm caters to consumers with heterogeneous preferences for a product. The firm collects consumer data to identify their types and issue an individualized price, whereas consumers can incur a cost to manipulate data and mimic the other type. We find that when the firm does not disclose its scope of data collection to consumers, it collects more consumer data. When the firm discloses its scope of data collection, it reduces data collection even when collecting more data is costless. The optimal scope of data collection increases when it is more costly for consumers to manipulate data but decreases when consumer demand becomes more heterogeneous. Moreover, a lower cost for consumers to manipulate data can be detrimental to both the firm and consumers. Lastly, disclosure of data collection scope increases firm profit, consumer surplus, and social welfare. Managerial implications: Our findings suggest that a firm should adjust its scope of data collection and prices based on whether the firm discloses the data collection scope, consumers’ manipulation cost, and demand heterogeneity. Public policies should require firms to disclose their data collection scope to increase consumer surplus and social welfare. Even without such a mandatory disclosure policy, firms should voluntarily disclose their data collection scope to increase profit. Moreover, public educational programs that train consumers to manipulate their data or raise their awareness of manipulation tools can ultimately hurt consumers and firms.

Selling Data to a Competitor (Extended Abstract)

Pareto-Improving Data-Sharing

Selling Information in Competitive Environments

Optimal Mechanisms for Selling Information

How to monetize data: An economic analysis of data monetization strategies under competition

Competing data intermediaries

Data Provision to an Informed Seller

Equilibrium Selling Mechanisms

Strategic data sales with partial segment profiling

Data Trade and Consumer Privacy

Exclusive Data, Price Manipulation and Market Leadership

The Economics of Social Data

Beating the Algorithm: Consumer Manipulation, Personalized Pricing, and Big Data Management

Pricing and disseminating customer data with privacy awareness

Optimal mechanism design with resale via bargaining

Towards Data Auctions with Externalities

Softening Competition Through Unilateral Sharing of Customer Data

A model of competing selling mechanisms

Optimized, Direct Sale of Privacy in Personal-Data Marketplaces

Strategic Incentives and the Optimal Sale of Information

An Incentive Mechanism for Trading Personal Data in Data Markets