Abstract:Problem definition: Firms heavily invest in big data technologies to collect consumer data and infer consumer preferences for price discrimination. However, consumers can use technological devices to manipulate their data and fool firms to obtain better deals. We examine how a firm invests in collecting consumer data and makes pricing decisions and whether it should disclose its scope of data collection to consumers who can manipulate their data. Methodology/results: We develop a game-theoretic model to consider a market in which a firm caters to consumers with heterogeneous preferences for a product. The firm collects consumer data to identify their types and issue an individualized price, whereas consumers can incur a cost to manipulate data and mimic the other type. We find that when the firm does not disclose its scope of data collection to consumers, it collects more consumer data. When the firm discloses its scope of data collection, it reduces data collection even when collecting more data is costless. The optimal scope of data collection increases when it is more costly for consumers to manipulate data but decreases when consumer demand becomes more heterogeneous. Moreover, a lower cost for consumers to manipulate data can be detrimental to both the firm and consumers. Lastly, disclosure of data collection scope increases firm profit, consumer surplus, and social welfare. Managerial implications: Our findings suggest that a firm should adjust its scope of data collection and prices based on whether the firm discloses the data collection scope, consumers’ manipulation cost, and demand heterogeneity. Public policies should require firms to disclose their data collection scope to increase consumer surplus and social welfare. Even without such a mandatory disclosure policy, firms should voluntarily disclose their data collection scope to increase profit. Moreover, public educational programs that train consumers to manipulate their data or raise their awareness of manipulation tools can ultimately hurt consumers and firms.

Exclusive Data, Price Manipulation and Market Leadership

Beating the Algorithm: Consumer Manipulation, Personalized Pricing, and Big Data Management

Selling Data to a Competitor (Extended Abstract)

Prominence And Market Power: Asymmetric Oligopoly With Sequential Consumer Search

How to monetize data: An economic analysis of data monetization strategies under competition

User Data and Endogenous Entry in Online Markets

Strategic data sales with partial segment profiling

Blessing or Curse? Implications of Data Brokers for Publisher Competition

Collusive Price Leadership Among Firms with Different Discount Factors

Competitive Imperfect Price Discrimination and Market Power

Large Firms, Consumer Heterogeneity and the Rising Share of Profits

Robust Regulation of Firms' Access to Consumer Data

ESTIMATING THE EFFECTOF EXCLUSIVITY ON MULTI-SIDED MARKETS: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF VIDEO GAME MARKET

Prominence-for-Data Schemes in Digital Platform Ecosystems: Implications for Platform Bias and Consumer Data Collection

Competing data intermediaries

Leadership, Dominance, and Preeminence in a Channel Structure with a Common Retailer

Dynamic pricing with multiple consumers and alternating offers under retailer competition: theory and experiment

Lead, Follow, or Go Your Own Way: Empirical Evidence Against Leader-Follower Behavior in Electronic Markets

Multi-period Pricing in the Presence of Competition and Social Influence

Pricing with Cookies: Behavior-Based Price Discrimination and Spatial Competition

Unlocking Market Potential: Strategic Consumer Segmentation and Dynamic Pricing for Balancing Loyalty and Deal Seeking