Abstract:Problem definition: Firms heavily invest in big data technologies to collect consumer data and infer consumer preferences for price discrimination. However, consumers can use technological devices to manipulate their data and fool firms to obtain better deals. We examine how a firm invests in collecting consumer data and makes pricing decisions and whether it should disclose its scope of data collection to consumers who can manipulate their data. Methodology/results: We develop a game-theoretic model to consider a market in which a firm caters to consumers with heterogeneous preferences for a product. The firm collects consumer data to identify their types and issue an individualized price, whereas consumers can incur a cost to manipulate data and mimic the other type. We find that when the firm does not disclose its scope of data collection to consumers, it collects more consumer data. When the firm discloses its scope of data collection, it reduces data collection even when collecting more data is costless. The optimal scope of data collection increases when it is more costly for consumers to manipulate data but decreases when consumer demand becomes more heterogeneous. Moreover, a lower cost for consumers to manipulate data can be detrimental to both the firm and consumers. Lastly, disclosure of data collection scope increases firm profit, consumer surplus, and social welfare. Managerial implications: Our findings suggest that a firm should adjust its scope of data collection and prices based on whether the firm discloses the data collection scope, consumers’ manipulation cost, and demand heterogeneity. Public policies should require firms to disclose their data collection scope to increase consumer surplus and social welfare. Even without such a mandatory disclosure policy, firms should voluntarily disclose their data collection scope to increase profit. Moreover, public educational programs that train consumers to manipulate their data or raise their awareness of manipulation tools can ultimately hurt consumers and firms.

Competitive Imperfect Price Discrimination and Market Power

Price discrimination with consumer misperception

Big Data and Competition Policy: Market Power, Personalised Pricing and Advertising

Online Price Discrimination and EU Data Privacy Law

Pricing with Cookies: Behavior-Based Price Discrimination and Spatial Competition

Price Discrimination as a Marketing Strategy

Pricing music using personal data: mutually advantageous first-degree price discrimination

Beating the Algorithm: Consumer Manipulation, Personalized Pricing, and Big Data Management

Big Data and Personalized Pricing

Input Price Discrimination by Resale Market

Behavior-based algorithmic pricing

Personalized Pricing and Consumer Welfare

Exclusive Data, Price Manipulation and Market Leadership

AI-enabled price discrimination as an abuse of dominance: a law and economics analysis

Intertemporal Price Discrimination with Complementary Products: E-Books and E-Readers

Regulatory Instruments for Fair Personalized Pricing

Third-Degree Price Discrimination Versus Uniform Pricing

Information acquisition and price discrimination in dynamic, decentralized markets

Second-Degree Price Discrimination by a Two-Sided Monopoly Platform

Consumer Behavior under Benevolent Price Discrimination

Competing for Recommendations: The Strategic Impact of Personalized Product Recommendations in Online Marketplaces