Abstract:General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)—the European Union’s data protection regulation—has two key principles. It recognizes that individuals own and control their personal (but not contractual) data in perpetuity, leading to three critical privacy rights, namely, the rights to (i) explicit consent (data opt-in), (ii) to be forgotten (data erasure), and (iii) portability (data transfer). It also includes data security mandates against privacy breaches through unauthorized access. We study GDPR’s equilibrium impact by including these features in a dynamic two-period model of forward-looking firms and consumers. Firms collect consumer data for personalization and price discrimination. Consumers trade off gains from personalization relative to potential losses from privacy breaches and price discrimination in their purchase, data opt-in, erasure, and transfer decisions. Though data security mandates impose fines on firms for privacy breaches, firms can benefit from higher opt-in given lower breach risk. Surprisingly, data security mandates can hurt consumers. The effect of privacy rights is nuanced. Since the right to opt in separates goods exchange from the provision of personal data, it prevents market failure under high breach risk. But it also reduces consumer opt-in and personal data availability. Erasure and portability rights reduce consumers’ hold-up concerns by disciplining firms to provide ongoing value by limiting price discrimination and not slacking off on data security; but they also reduce the incentive to offer lower initial prices that encourages opt-in. Overall, privacy rights always benefit consumers in competitive markets, but they can surprisingly hurt consumers under monopoly, as monopolists have less incentives to subsidize consumer opt-in. They raise (reduce) firm profit and social welfare when breach risk is high (low). Finally, privacy rights increase firm profit most at moderate levels of data transferability. This paper was accepted by Dmitri Kuksov, marketing. Funding: T. T. Ke acknowledges financial support from the General Research Fund of the Hong Kong Research Grants Council [Grant 14500421]. Supplemental Material: The e-companion is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4614 .

Data Trade and Consumer Privacy

Preference-Based Privacy Trading

An Incentive Mechanism for Trading Personal Data in Data Markets

Pricing and disseminating customer data with privacy awareness

Game Theoretic Data Privacy Preservation: Equilibrium And Pricing

Privacy Rights and Data Security: GDPR and Personal Data Markets

Privacy or Utility in Data Collection? A Contract Theoretic Approach

Data Privacy and Algorithmic Inequality

Contract-Based Private Data Collecting

The Value of Privacy: Strategic Data Subjects, Incentive Mechanisms and Fundamental Limits

Optimized, Direct Sale of Privacy in Personal-Data Marketplaces

On the Differential Private Data Market: Endogenous Evolution, Dynamic Pricing, and Incentive Compatibility

A Privacy Protection Model of Data Publication Based on Game Theory

Personal Data Market Optimization Pricing Model Based on Privacy Level

Willing Buyer, Willing Seller: Personal Data Trade as a Service

Beating the Algorithm: Consumer Manipulation, Personalized Pricing, and Big Data Management

How to Balance Privacy and Money through Pricing Mechanism in Personal Data Market

Selling Data to a Competitor (Extended Abstract)

Optimal Trading Mechanism Based on Differential Privacy Protection and Stackelberg Game in Big Data Market

Privacy Risk is a Function of Information Type: Learnings for the Surveillance Capitalism Age.

Establishing the Price of Privacy in Federated Data Trading