Group Dynamics in Inquiry-based Labs: Gender Inequities and the Efficacy of Partner Agreements

Matthew Dew,Emma Hunt,Viranga Perera,Jonathan Perry,Gregorio Ponti,Andrew Loveridge
2024-01-11
Abstract:Recent studies provide evidence that social constructivist pedagogical methods such as active learning, interactive engagement, and inquiry-based learning, while pedagogically more effective, can enable inequities in the classroom. By conducting a quantitative empirical examination of gender-inequitable group dynamics in two inquiry-based physics labs, we extend results of previous work. Using a survey on group work preferences and video recordings of lab sessions, we find similar patterns of gendered role-taking noted in prior studies. These results are not reducible to differences in students' preferences. We find that an intervention which employed partner agreement forms, with the goal of reducing inequities, had a positive impact on students' engagement with equipment during a first-semester lab course. Our work will inform implementation of more effective interventions in the future and emphasizes challenges faced by instructors who are dedicated to both research-based pedagogical practices and efforts to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion in their classrooms.
Physics Education
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the issue of gender inequality in inquiry-based physics lab courses and evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention. Specifically: 1. **Extending previous research findings**: The paper aims to extend the findings from previous research conducted at Cornell University to a non-physics major STEM student population at a large public research university in the southern United States (University of Texas at Austin). In this way, the paper hopes to verify whether similar gender role division inequalities occur in different contexts. 2. **Controlling for preference factors**: By combining students' reports on their preferences for group collaboration with actual observed behavior data, the paper attempts to unify and control the role division model from previous research, thereby eliminating the influence of individual preference differences. 3. **Evaluating the effectiveness of the intervention**: The paper also explores an intervention method designed based on social constructivist theory—having students fill out a partner agreement form in hopes of reducing potential unfair dynamics in the classroom. This method aims to promote fairer task distribution and equipment usage by involving students in the process of establishing group collaboration rules. In summary, the main goal of this study is to identify and mitigate gender inequalities in inquiry-based lab environments while evaluating the practical effectiveness of the proposed intervention strategy, providing a basis for more effective educational improvements in the future.