Abstract:Abstract This study aimed to compare female and male students’ attitudes and achievements within different learning settings determined by e-learning and in-classroom learning modalities, collaborative (CL), and traditional (TL) learning pedagogies and investigated the effect of single-gender (SG) and mixed-gender (MG) grouping in an undergraduate biology course. 1375 biology students enrolled in a public university were randomly divided into 12 learning settings. Keller’s ARCS model and Vygotsky’s Socio-cultural Theory were the theoretical frameworks that guided this study. Results indicated that females attained higher achievement and more positive attitude towards biology in TL and CL sections in single-gender compared to mix-gender classes; overall, academic achievements between females and males demonstrated a significant difference at P < .05. Females students performed relatively low achievement and had a negative attitude toward biology in mix-gender CL groups (2 Females + 2 Males) compared to single-gender CL groups (4 Females) in in-classroom modality. E-learning attenuated the negative impact of mixed-gender grouping on female students within e-learning CL settings. The effect size value indicated that males benefited more than females from mixed-gender CL (2F + 2 M) pedagogy in e-learning and in-classroom modalities. Thus, e-learning may encourage female students to overcome the socio-cultural barrier that leads them to feel reticence in mixed-gender groups. The study helps to understand the most suitable learning settings for female and male students to decrease gender disparities, reduce the negative influences of stereotypical threats in different socio-cultural environments, and develop learning strategies to further equalize opportunities for females and male students, promoting students’ attitudes and achievement in undergraduate biology education.

Gender Differences in Student Participation in an Active-Learning Classroom

Gendered Performance Gaps in an Upper-Division Biology Course: Academic, Demographic, Environmental, and Affective Factors

Gender and Student Participation

When Active Learning Is Inequitable: Women’s Participation Predicts Gender Inequities in Mathematical Performance

Gender Differences in Class Participation in Core CS Courses

Female In-Class Participation and Performance Increase with More Female Peers and/or a Female Instructor in Life Sciences Courses

Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math

Group Dynamics in Inquiry-based Labs: Gender Inequities and the Efficacy of Partner Agreements

Gender Differences in Class Participation in Online versus In-Person Core CS Courses

Breaking Barriers: Investigating Gender Dynamics in Introductory Physics Lab Classes

Group roles in unstructured labs show inequitable gender divide

Despite Similar Perceptions and Attitudes, Postbaccalaureate Students Outperform in Introductory Biology and Chemistry Courses

Swimming against the tide: Gender bias in the physics classroom

Gender representation and academic achievement among STEM‐interested students in college STEM courses

The impact of e-learning, gender-groupings and learning pedagogies in biology undergraduate female and male students’ attitudes and achievement

Different Gender Students' Participation in the High- and Low-achieving Middle School Questioning-orientated Biology Classrooms in Taiwan

In What Environment Can Female College Students Excel? an Analysis of Gender Differences in Learning of Chinese College Students

Mind the Gap: Investigating Disaggregated Student Performance in an Upper-Division Biochemistry Course Following Team-Based Learning

Gender-related differences in learning in student-led PBL tutorials

Positive attitudinal shifts and a narrowing gender gap: Do expertlike attitudes correlate to higher learning gains for women in the physics classroom?

Active physiology learning in a diverse class: an analysis of medical student responses in terms of sex, home language, and self-reported test performance