Abstract:Current trends suggest that significant gender disparities exist within Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education at university, with female students being underrepresented in physics, but more equally represented in life sciences (e.g., biology, medicine). To understand these trends, it is important to consider the context in which students make decisions about which university courses to enrol in. The current study seeks to investigate gender differences in STEM through a unique approach that combines network analysis of student enrollment data with an interpretive lens based on the sociological theory of Pierre Bourdieu. We generate a network of courses taken by around 9000 undergraduate physics students (from 2009 to 2014) to quantify Bourdieu's concept of field. We identify the fields in which physics students participate by constructing a weighted co-enrollment network and finding communities within it. We then use odds ratios to report gender differences in transverse movements between different academic fields, and non-parametric tests to assess gender differences in vertical movements (changes in students' achievement rankings within a field). Odds ratios comparing the likelihood of progression from one field to another indicate that female students were more likely to make transverse movements into life science fields. We also found that university physics did a poor job in attracting high achieving students, and especially high achieving female students. Of the students who did choose to study physics at university, low and middle achieving female high school students were more likely to decrease their relative rank in their first year compared to their male counterparts. Low achieving female students were also less likely to continue with physics after their first year compared to their male counterparts. Results and implications are discussed in the context of Bourdieu's theory, and previous research. We argue that in order to remove constraints on female students' study choices, the field of physics needs to provide a culture in which all students feel like they belong.

Preliminary evidence for available roles in mixed-gender and all-women lab groups

Group roles in unstructured labs show inequitable gender divide

Breaking Barriers: Investigating Gender Dynamics in Introductory Physics Lab Classes

Group Dynamics in Inquiry-based Labs: Gender Inequities and the Efficacy of Partner Agreements

Participating in the Physics Lab: Does Gender Matter?

Gender Equity in Physics Labs: A Review

Hermione and the Secretary: how gendered task division in introductory physics labs can disrupt equitable learning

Gender Disparities in Nobel Prize Winning Labs. A Look into Glass Ceilings, Maternal Walls and Bottlenecks

The Role Gender Differences In Computational Thinking Confidence Levels Plays In Stem Applications

Swimming against the tide: Gender bias in the physics classroom

A Leaky Pipe Dream? A Study of Gender Differences in Undergraduate Physics

Gender Differences in Student Participation in an Active-Learning Classroom

Gendered performance differences in introductory physics: A study from a large land-grant university

Exploring the pre-instruction gender gap in physics.

A longitudinal analysis of students' motivational characteristics in introductory physics courses: Gender differences

Bourdieu, networks, and movements: Using the concepts of habitus, field and capital to understand a network analysis of gender differences in undergraduate physics

Characterizing Discourse Group Roles in Inquiry-based University Science Labs

When Active Learning Is Inequitable: Women’s Participation Predicts Gender Inequities in Mathematical Performance

The impact of e-learning, gender-groupings and learning pedagogies in biology undergraduate female and male students’ attitudes and achievement

Gender Differences in Teamwork and Leadership within Virtual Engineering Laboratories

Gender-related differences in learning in student-led PBL tutorials