Abstract:Several ASTM standards on the fracture of glued and welded joints need attention because they do not consider the Griffith energy criterion of cracking which was proposed a century ago. It is almost as if Griffith never existed because the ASTM definition of failure is the stress criterion postulated by Galileo in 1638 in which stress at failure (i.e. strength = force/area) is defined as the determinant of fracture. Irene Martinez Villegas (Villegas, Rans 2021 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20200296. ( doi:10.1098/rsta.2020.0296 )) shows in this volume that attempts to use ASTM D5868 to standardize welded composite (carbon fibre reinforced polymer, CFRP) lap joints reveal major problems. First, the test is a low angle bend–peel test; not shear. Second, the energy required to break the joint is not emphasized so that joints may have high strength properties but also low toughness; third, the fracture force is not proportional to the lap joint area so the concept of strength independent of sample size is false; fourth, as the CFRP panels are made thicker, the strength rises at constant overlap area so the strength can be any value you want; fifth, the strength of larger joints goes down; this is the size effect noted in many bend-cracking tests, much as Galileo suggested for bent beam fracture in his famous book ‘the larger the machine, the greater its weakness'. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that poor ASTM ‘shear strength’ standards should be replaced by a definition of welded lap joint performance based on Griffith's energy conservation argument in which fracture surface energy is the main parameter resisting failure. The foundation of this Griffith-style lap joint analysis for long cracks goes back to 1975 but has been largely ignored until now because it does not fit the Griffith equation for cracked sheets, has no ‘stress intensity factor’, and travels at constant speed, not accelerating like the standard Griffith tension crack. This study of tensile delamination shows that a long lap crack is not driven by stress near the crack but by changes in stored elastic energy in the stretched strips remote from the crack tip, while strain energy release rate is negative. It would be more appropriate to call this lap failure a tensile delamination crack. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘A cracking approach to inventing new tough materials: fracture stranger than friction’.

The trousers fracture test for viscoelastic elastomers

The delayed fracture test for viscoelastic elastomers

The "pure-shear" fracture test for viscoelastic elastomers and its revelation on Griffith fracture

Energizing ASTM lap joint fracture standards

The single edge notch fracture test for viscoelastic elastomers

Research on the Anti-Cracking Performance of High Viscoelastic Tar Sands

Energy-Based Crack Initiation Criterion for Viscoelastoplastic Materials with Distributed Cracks

Some comments on the fracture of viscoelastic solids

Essential work of fracture of soft elastomers

A Griffith description of fracture for non-monotonic loading with application to fatigue

An Energy-Based Crack Growth Criterion for Modelling Elastic-Plastic Ductile Fracture

A MICROSCOPY INVESTIGATION OF RUBBER COMPOUND CRACK PRECURSORS AND TENSILE FRACTURE SURFACES

Failure criterion for highly stretchable elastomers under triaxial loading

Cavitation/fracture transition of soft materials

Hyperelastic effects in brittle materials failure

Constitutive modeling for the tear fracture of rubber with filler particles

Crack initiation in viscoelastic materials

Characterization of fracture behavior under impact-like loading conditions of elastomeric grades for high-pressure gas applications

Cohesive Dynamics and Brittle Fracture

Criticality in the approach to failure in amorphous solids