Abstract:Regenerative medicine and tissue engineering are hindered by the lack of consistent measurements and standards for the mechanical characterization of tissue and scaffolds. Indentation methods for soft matter are favored because of their compatibility with small, arbitrarily shaped samples, but contact mechanics models required to interpret data are often inappropriate for soft, viscous materials. In this study, we demonstrate indentation experiments on a variety of human biopsies, animal tissue, and engineered scaffolds, and we explore the complexities of fitting analytical models to these data. Although objections exist to using Hertz contact models for soft, viscoelastic biological materials since soft matter violates their original assumptions, we demonstrate the experimental conditions that enable consistency and comparability (regardless of arguable misappropriation). Appropriate experimental conditions involving sample hydration, the indentation depth, and the ratio of the probe size to sample thickness enable repeatable metrics that are valuable when comparing synthetic scaffolds and host tissue, and bounds on these parameters are carefully described and discussed. We have also identified a reliable quasistatic parameter that can be derived from indentation data to help researchers compare results across materials and experiments. Although Hertz contact mechanics and linear viscoelastic models may constitute oversimplification for biological materials, the reporting of such simple metrics alongside more complex models is expected to support researchers in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine by providing consistency across efforts to characterize soft matter. Impact Statement To engineer replacement tissue requires a deep understanding of its biomechanical properties. Mesoscale indentation (between micron and millimeter length scales) is well-suited to characterize tissue and engineered replacements as it accommodates small, oddly shaped samples. However, it is easy to run afoul of the assumptions for common contact models when working with biological materials. In this study, we describe experimental procedures and modeling approaches that allow researchers to take advantage of indentation for biomechanical characterization while minimizing its weaknesses.

Influence of adhesion on oscillatory indentations of viscoelastic biomaterials by a rigid cone

Numerical studies on deformation and adhesion behaviour of substrate during nanoindentation

Axisymmetric Indentations of an Elastic Half-Space with Tensed Surface/Membrane in the Johnson–Kendall–Roberts Adhesive Approximation

In Situ Elasticity and Adhesion Measurement of Biomembrane by a Video Enhanced Depth-Sensing Indentation Technique

Universal contact stiffness of elastic solids covered with tensed membranes and its application in indentation tests of biological materials

Modulating adhesion strength in multi-ferroic composite materials: Insights from adhesive contact with arbitrary profile indenters

Exact Axisymmetric Adhesive Contact Analysis for a Pre-Deformed Soft Electroactive Half-Space

Video Enhanced Depth-Sensing Indentation Technique for Characterizing Mechanical Behaviour of Biomaterials

Probing Mechanical Principles of Focal Contacts in Cell–matrix Adhesion with a Coupled Stochastic–elastic Modelling Framework

Mechanics of Molecular Bond Clusters Between Elastic Media: Stochastic-Elastic Coupling in Cell-Matrix Adhesion

An updated model including the deflection history of microcantilever for characterizing cellular viscoelastic properties by AFM indentation-relaxation test

An indentation-based approach to determine the elastic constants of soft anisotropic tissues

On the Determination of Elastic Moduli of Cells by AFM Based Indentation

Mechanical Characterization by Mesoscale Indentation: Advantages and Pitfalls for Tissue and Scaffolds

Identifying the Viscoelastic Properties of Soft Matter from the Indentation Response of a Hard Film-Soft Substrate System

Finite Element Modelling of Nanoindentation Based Methods for Mechanical Properties of Cells

Are elastic moduli of biological cells depth dependent or not? Another explanation using a contact mechanics model with surface tension.

Effect of adsorbate viscoelasticity on dynamical responses of laminated microcantilever resonators

Adhesion-Induced Instability Regulates Contact Mechanics of Soft Thin Elastic Films.

Bulk and fracture process zone contribution to the rate-dependent adhesion amplification in viscoelastic broad-band materials

Spherical indentation on biological films with surface energy