Radiation dose exposure of patients undergoing 320-row cardiac CT for assessing coronary angiography and global left ventricular function

Chien-Ming Chen,Yuan-Chang Liu,Chun-Chi Chen,Ming-Shien Wen,Chien-Fu Hung,Yung-Liang Wan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0065-x
Abstract:A 320-row multidetector CT provides the capability for prospective electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated coronary CT angiography (CTA) and tube current modulated cardiac function assessment (CFA). We assessed and compared the effective radiation dose of these two modes. On a prospective basis, we performed ECG-gated cardiac CT on 119 patients (87 were males). For heart rates (HRs) </=65 beats/min (bpm), we used one-heartbeat acquisition and half-scan reconstruction. HRs from 66 to 79 bpm and >/=80 bpm were scanned with either two or three heartbeats acquisitions, respectively. We used two types of scans. One type was based on a prospective ECG-gated CTA mode and the other using a tube current modulated CFA mode covering an entire R-R interval. The mean BMI of patients was 25.4 (range 18.8-49.3). Fifty-one patients (42.9 %) underwent CFA scanning, while the remaining 68 (57.1 %) had CTA. The majority of patients completed the scan in a single heartbeat (59.7 %). The mean dose of CTA mode at 65-85 % phase window for one and two heartbeats was 3.68 mSv (2.40-7.23) and 8.61 mSv (6.76-10.60), respectively. The mean dose of CFA mode for a single heartbeat measurement with dose modulation (25 % dose for CFA, and 100 % dose during 65-85 % phase window for CTA) was 6.32 mSv (4.69-8.89). CTA with prospective ECG-gating allows for acceptable image quality and radiation dose. HR reduction is mandatory to minimize radiation exposure. Global left ventricle function can be assessed with a single heartbeat within an acceptable radiation dose.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?