Abstract:Our brains predict future sensory input based on their current beliefs about the world around us, but interpreting prediction errors can be challenging in a volatile environment because they can be caused by stochastic noise or by outdated predictions. Noisy signals should be integrated with prior beliefs to improve precision, but the two should be segregated when environmental changes render prior beliefs irrelevant. Bayesian inference provides a statistically optimal solution to deal with situations in which there is uncertainty about the cause of the prediction errors. However, the method quickly becomes memory intensive and computationally intractable when applied consecutively. Here, we systematically evaluate the predictive performance of Bayesian causal inference for human perceptual decisions in a spatial prediction task based on noisy audiovisual sequences with occasional changepoints. We elucidate the simplifying assumptions of a previously proposed reduced Bayesian observer model, and we compare it to an extensive set of models based on alternative simplification strategies. Model-free analyses revealed the hallmarks of Bayesian causal inference: participants seem to have integrated sensory evidence with prior beliefs to improve accuracy when prediction errors were small, and prior influence gradually decreased as prediction errors grew larger, signalling probable irrelevance of the prior due to a changepoint. Model comparison results further supported the hypotheses that participants computed probability-weighted averages over the causal options (noise or changepoint) and that they iteratively summarized their beliefs while accounting for causal uncertainty akin to the reduced Bayesian observer model. However, we also found that participants' reliance on prior beliefs was systematically smaller than predicted by the model, and this was best explained by individually fitting lower-than-optimal parameters for the a-priori probability of prior relevance. We conclude that perceptual belief updating in volatile environments with stochastic noise is well described by a simplified model of consecutive Bayesian causal inference. Observers utilize priors flexibly to the extent that they are deemed relevant, though also conservatively with a lower tendency to bind than an ideal Bayesian observer.

The interplay of uncertainty, relevance and learning influences auditory categorization

Individual-specific strategies inform category learning

Systematic changes in neural selectivity reflect the acquired salience of category-diagnostic dimensions

Initial Uncertainty Impacts Statistical Learning in Sound Sequence Processing

Resolving the time course of visual and auditory object categorization

Learning of Uncertain Stimuli Transfers from Criterion-Based to Noise-Based Perceptual Decision, but Not Vice Versa

Different types of uncertainty in multisensory perceptual decision making

Neural dynamics underlying the acquisition of distinct auditory category structures

Humans use overconfident estimates of auditory spatial and temporal uncertainty for perceptual inference

Attentional modulation and domain-specificity underlying the neural organization of auditory categorical perception

Modality-specific impacts of distractors on visual and auditory categorical decision-making: an evidence accumulation perspective

Surprising sounds influence risky decision making

Dual systems of speech category learning across the lifespan.

Relevance and the Role of Labels in Categorization

Perceptual uncertainty modulates auditory statistical learning: A magnetoencephalography study

Asymmetrical Transfer of Learning Effects Between Signal-Based and Criterion-Based Task Uncertainties in Perceptual Decision

Maintenance of subcategorical information during speech perception: Revisiting misunderstood limitations

Musical experience is linked to enhanced dimension-selective attention to pitch and increased primary weighting during suprasegmental categorization.

How relevant is the prior? Bayesian causal inference for dynamic perception in volatile environments

The role of perceptual similarities in determining the asymmetric mixed-category advantage.