Abstract:When females choose mates, males may respond in several ways: by allowing an evaluation by the female and investing substantially in subsequent reproduction (here, type 1), by allowing evaluation but withholding investment following mating (type 2), or by preventing evaluation and attempting to coerce the female to mate (type 3). In this modeling analysis, we examine the conditions under which these strategies, individually or in combination, are expected to persist in the population primarily using the criterion of evolutionary stability. We also consider the roles of female resistance, social policing, and extra-pair paternity in influencing these outcomes. Using six focal systems taken from primates, fish, birds, and insects, we derived parameters for a game-theoretical model to determine the expected evolutionary stable frequencies or unstable combinations of the male strategies based on system-specific parameter magnitudes. In chimpanzees, guppies, Japanese water striders, and scorpionflies, males making the highest investment in each reproductive event were the sole persisting type; in mallard ducks, an evolutionarily stable mixture of types 1 and 3 prevailed; and in humans, a stable mixture of types 1 and 2 persisted. In accord with the infrequency of consistent coercion across taxa, our results suggest that coercion may often be evolutionarily unstable and available only opportunistically as the strategy of last resort.Significance statementOur game theory model examined mate choice in six species of primates, fish birds, and insects to identify patterns predicted to persist from an evolutionary perspective. We found that differences in ecological, physiological, and behavioral characteristics resulted in the persistence of individual or multiple male mating strategies generally consistent with observations in nature. In particular, coercive males could persist in a population when fertilization rates and reproductive outcomes were similar to those of less forceful males.

Competing females strategically combine signals and physical aggression differently from males in a polygynous tropical lizard

Overriding reproductive constraints: Hormonal profiles fail to predict intrasexual competition

Intra-sexual selection in cooperative mammals and birds: why are females not bigger and better armed?

Females Prefer Males with Superior Fighting Abilities but Avoid Sexually Harassing Winners when Eavesdropping on Male Fights

Multimodal female mate choice in a polymorphic flat rock lizard

When Rivals Are Absent: Male Aggression Towards Females in Bluefin Killifish

Sex ratio and the evolution of aggression in fruit flies

Author Response for "female‐female Aggression in a Cooperatively Breeding Bird During the Non‐breeding Period: the Behavioral Strategy to Maintain Long‐term Partnerships"

Sex Differences in Aggression: Female Hermit Crabs Initiate Few Fights against Males and Lose Most of Those

Intrasexual Competition Enhances Reproductive Isolation Between Locally Adapted Populations

Cross-context behavioural correlations and signals of aggression in females of a livebearing fish

Beyond color and pattern: elucidating the factors associated with intraspecific aggression in the mimic poison frog (Ranitomeya imitator)

How Female-Female Competition Affects Male-Male Competition: Insights into Postcopulatory Sexual Selection from Socially Polyandrous Species

Male-male interactions shape mate selection in Drosophila

Female mate choice and the emergence of male coercion

Competing for the benefit of offspring eliminates the gender gap in competitiveness

Female-female aggression in goitered gazelles: the desire for isolation

Plasticity of sex-biased aggression in response to the sex of territory intruders in an African cichlid fish, Julidochromis marlieri

Social competition stimulates cognitive performance in a sex-specific manner

Dialogues in colour and behaviour - Integration of complex signalling traits and physiology

Female homosexual behavior and inter-sexual mate competition in Japanese macaques: Possible implications for sexual selection theory