Abstract:The Darwin–Bateman paradigm predicts that females enhance their fitness by being choosy and mating with high‐quality males, while males should compete to mate with as many females as possible. In many species, males enhance their fitness by defending females and/or resources used by females. That is, males directly defend access to mating opportunities. However, paternity analyses have repeatedly shown that females in most species mate polyandrously, which contradicts traditional expectations that male defensive behaviours lead to monandry. Here, in an extensive meta‐analysis, encompassing 109 species and 1026 effect sizes from across the animal kingdom, we tested if the occurrence of defensive behaviours modulates sexual selection on females and males. If so, we can illuminate the extent to which males really succeed in defending access to mating and fertilisation opportunities. We used four different indices of the opportunity for sexual selection that comprise pre‐mating and/or post‐mating episodes of selection. We found, for both sexes, that the occurrence of defensive behaviours does not modulate the potential strength of sexual selection. This implies that male defensive behaviours do not predict the true intensity of sexual selection. While the most extreme levels of sexual selection on males are in species with male defensive behaviours, which indicates that males do sometimes succeed in restricting females' re‐mating ability (e.g. elephant seals, Mirounga leonina), estimates of the opportunity for sexual selection vary greatly across species, regardless of whether or not defensive behaviours occur. Indeed, widespread polyandry shows that females are usually not restricted by male defensive behaviours. In addition, our results indicate that post‐mating episodes of selection, such as cryptic female choice and sperm competition, might be important factors modulating the opportunity for sexual selection. We discuss: (i) why male defensive behaviours fail to lower the opportunity for sexual selection among females or fail to elevate it for males; (ii) how post‐mating events might influence sexual selection; and (iii) the role of females as active participants in sexual selection. We also highlight that inadequate data reporting in the literature prevented us from extracting effect sizes from many studies that had presumably collected the relevant data.

Female homosexual behavior and inter-sexual mate competition in Japanese macaques: Possible implications for sexual selection theory

Hormonal contraceptive affects heterosexual but not homosexual behavior in free-ranging female Japanese macaques over 17 mating seasons

Homosexual Courtship in Young Wild Capuchin Monkeys: A Case Study

Intra-sexual selection in cooperative mammals and birds: why are females not bigger and better armed?

MHC-associated mating strategies and the importance of overall genetic diversity in an obligate pair-living primate

Sexual selection in females and the evolution of polyandry

How Female-Female Competition Affects Male-Male Competition: Insights into Postcopulatory Sexual Selection from Socially Polyandrous Species

The Island of Female Power? Intersexual Dominance Relationships in the Lemurs of Madagascar

Reproductive Strategy Inferred from Major Histocompatibility Complex-Based Inter-Individual, Sperm-Egg, and Mother-Fetus Recognitions in Giant Pandas (ailuropoda Melanoleuca)

Multi-omics analysis reveals changes in tryptophan and cholesterol metabolism before and after sexual maturation in captive macaques

Same-sex sexual behavior in brown-headed spider monkeys (Ateles fusciceps fusciceps) during grappling between two subadult males

Influence of female coalitionary aggressive behavior on the success of male introductions to female groups of rhesus macaques (Macaca Mulatta)

Female mate choice and the emergence of male coercion

Competing females strategically combine signals and physical aggression differently from males in a polygynous tropical lizard

Does the potential strength of sexual selection differ between mating systems with and without defensive behaviours? A meta‐analysis

Comparative analysis of intragroup intermale relationships: A study of wild bonobos ( ) in Wamba, Democratic Republic of Congo and chimpanzees ( ) in Kalinzu Forest Reserve, Uganda

Male monkeys use punishment and coercion to de-escalate costly intergroup fights

Mating system variation and gene expression in the male reproductive tract of Peromyscus mice

MHC heterozygosity may increase subordinate but not alpha male siring success in white-faced capuchin monkeys ( )

Female responses to experimental removal of sexual selection components in Drosophila melanogaster

MHC-Based Mate Choice in Wild Golden Snub-Nosed Monkeys