Atomic Structure of Hematite ($α$-Fe$_2$O$_3$) Nanocube Surface; Synchrotron X-ray Diffraction Study

Chang-Yong Kim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoso.2020.100497

2020-05-15

Abstract:Atomic structure of a mono-dispersive hematite ($\alpha$-Fe$_2$O$_3$) nanocube $(0 1\bar1 2)$ surface was determined with synchrotron X-ray diffraction. The $\alpha$-Fe$_2$O$_3$ nanocubes were prepared through a hydrothermal process and a single layer of nanocubes was deposited on a silicon substrate with a drop cast method. The alignment of nanocubes with their $(0 1\bar1 2)$ surfaces parallel to the substrate is confirmed with grazing incidence X-ray diffraction. Specular crystal truncation rods (CTR's) from as-prepared and vacuum annealed nanocube surfaces have been measured and they are drastically different from previously reported CTR's from macroscopic single crystal $(0 1\bar1 2)$ surfaces. The measured CTR's from nanocube surfaces are explained well with the atomic structure models of half of atoms in top Fe layer being missing while extra oxygen-layers cover the half-missing Fe layer. An acidic environment during hydrothermal nanocube synthesis process is proposed as the main cause of the difference.

Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The key problem that this paper attempts to solve is to determine the atomic structure on the surface of α - Fe₂O₃ (hematite) nanocubes and explain how it differs from the macroscopic single - crystal surface structure. Specifically, the researchers explored the differences in the atomic structure of the nanocube surface in hydrated and vacuum - annealed states through synchrotron radiation X - ray diffraction (XRD) techniques, especially crystal truncation rod (CTR) measurements.

### Main problems:
1. **Determining the atomic structure on the nanocube surface**: The researchers used synchrotron radiation X - ray diffraction techniques to accurately measure the atomic arrangement on the nanocube surface.
2. **Explaining the differences between the nanocube surface and the macroscopic single - crystal surface structure**: The study found that the CTR on the nanocube surface is significantly different from that of the previously reported macroscopic single - crystal surface, which may be due to the influence of the acidic environment during the synthesis process.
3. **Proposing a reasonable surface model**: By fitting the experimental data, the researchers proposed a "half - Fe - missing" surface model, in which half of the top - layer Fe atoms are missing, and an extra oxygen layer covers these missing Fe sites.

### Research background:
- Hematite (α - Fe₂O₃) is an important metal oxide nanoparticle, which has wide applications in multiple fields such as medical imaging, drug delivery, and catalysis due to its unique physicochemical properties.
- The surface structure of nanoparticles has an important impact on their properties, but traditional characterization methods are difficult to accurately describe the atomic structure on the nanoparticle surface.
- This study, for the first time, achieved accurate measurement of the atomic structure on the nanoparticle surface through synchrotron radiation X - ray diffraction techniques.

### Conclusions:
- The research results show that the nanocube surface has the characteristic of "half - Fe - missing" in the hydrated state, which is different from the previous macroscopic single - crystal surface structure model.
- This difference may be attributed to the influence of the acidic environment during the hydrothermal synthesis process, resulting in the partial loss of surface Fe atoms and the formation of an extra oxygen layer.
- This study provides a new perspective for understanding the differences between the nanoparticle surface structure and its macroscopic counterpart and provides valuable references for future research.

### Formula explanations:
The formulas involved in this paper are mainly concentrated in the data processing and fitting process of X - ray diffraction, such as the Voigt function and Lorenz correction used for CTR fitting. The specific formula expressions are as follows:

- The Voigt function is used to fit the rocking curve:
\[
I(q)=\frac{A}{\sigma\sqrt{2\pi}}\cdot\left(\frac{\gamma^{2}}{\gamma^{2}+(q - q_0)^{2}}+e^{-\frac{(q - q_0)^{2}}{2\sigma^{2}}}\right)
\]
where \(A\) is the amplitude, \(\sigma\) is the Gaussian width, \(\gamma\) is the Lorentz width, and \(q_0\) is the peak position.

- The Lorenz correction is used to correct the diffraction intensity:
\[
I_{\text{corr}}(q)=I(q)\cdot\frac{1}{\sin(\theta)}
\]
where \(\theta\) is the diffraction angle.

These formulas ensure the accurate processing and fitting of experimental data, thus obtaining a reliable surface structure model.